Nowadays, an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, an increasing number of people with health problems are using alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their normal doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
Nowadays, the academic workforce and research papers are growing significantly There are opinions stating that these researches must focus on improving our living conditions as its ultimate goal. I fully agree to this statement and this writing will provide supporting arguments for the perspective.
First, our modern society is build upon scientific developments. From as tiny as a screwdriver to as massive as an airplane, they are the arterfacts of science research for centuries. On the macro levels, political and economic policies that impact directly our grocery baskets are the results of countless studies in this field. If there had not been science, the society would not have had its modern shape, and the efforts of past studies are to improve our lives.
Second, all of the existed scientific developments serve the interests of human beings. There is a wide body of literature concerning issues such as wildlife conservation, history, or astrology. At first glance, the topics may not be relevant to our daily activities and are less likely to improve our lives. However, they have a more dynamic and complicated correlation to mankind than straightforward topics like economics. In the end, they serve only one purpose of ensure an environment that foster mankind development.
In general, this essay shed lights on the topic of whether science should only aim at improving our living conditions. It is argued that in the past, present and future days, science would and would only serve our interests both directly and indirectly.