Nowadays some parents think that spoken English is more important than English grammar. Do you agree or disagree? Write an essay 180-280 words to express your idea

I concur with some parental opinions that emphasize the importance of spoken English over English grammar. I maintain this agreement because of the superiority in the enhancement of communication skills and the practicality spoken English provides.

Learning spoken English is crucial because it helps users communicate with more articulation and fluency. With these benefits, conversation with English people is more natural, as users can express themselves more confidently. This allows them to be understood more easily, aiding in making more friends or business collaboration. For example, an entrepreneur, with his proficiency in spoken English, can easily negotiate deals and finalize contracts with international partners, ultimately boosting career growth. In contrast, mastery in grammar rules only develop your grammar, does not help individuals grasp the nuance of English like oral communication. For instance, understanding colloquial expression through grammatical rules is impossible compared to the ease in spoken English.

Another aspect supporting the significance of spoken English over grammar is its practicality. There are numerous professions with high salary requiring individuals having good command of spoken English such interpreters or flight attendants. Impossibility for these jobs is absolute if mastery in English grammar instead of oral communication. In addition, there is no job that demand good foundation of grammar, rendering seeking employment with grammar studies become more difficult. Consequently, a person devoting time to learning spoken English can have stable job with high income catering for personal life, which is far from easy with grammar studiers

In conclusion, I hold the agreement with some parental perspectives regarding the significance of spoken English over English grammar due to the pragmatic applications and the development in communication ability it provides.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"I concur with some parental opinions that emphasize the importance of spoken English over English grammar." -> "I agree with certain parental viewpoints that underscore the importance of spoken English over English grammar."
Explanation: Replacing "I concur" with "I agree" and using "viewpoints" instead of "opinions" elevates the formality of the sentence. Additionally, "underscore" is a more precise term than "emphasize" in an academic context.
"I maintain this agreement because of the superiority in the enhancement of communication skills and the practicality spoken English provides." -> "I uphold this agreement due to the superior enhancement of communication skills and the practicality offered by spoken English."
Explanation: "Maintain" is replaced with "uphold" for a more formal tone. "Superior" is a stronger term than "importance," and the phrase "offered by spoken English" is more formal and clearer than "spoken English provides."
"Learning spoken English is crucial because it helps users communicate with more articulation and fluency." -> "Acquiring spoken English is vital as it enables users to communicate with greater articulation and fluency."
Explanation: The use of "acquiring" instead of "learning" and the phrase "enables users to communicate" enhances formality. "Greater" is more precise than "more," and "articulation and fluency" maintain a formal tone.
"With these benefits, conversation with English people is more natural, as users can express themselves more confidently." -> "These advantages make conversations with English speakers more natural, allowing users to express themselves with greater confidence."
Explanation: Replacing "benefits" with "advantages" and using "make conversations" instead of "conversation" contribute to a more formal style. "Allowing" is a more formal term than "as," and "greater confidence" is more precise than "more confidently."
"In contrast, mastery in grammar rules only develop your grammar, does not help individuals grasp the nuance of English like oral communication." -> "In contrast, mastering grammar rules only develops your linguistic proficiency and does not assist individuals in grasping the nuances of English as effectively as oral communication."
Explanation: "Mastery in" is replaced with "mastering" for better syntax, and "linguistic proficiency" is a more formal term than "your grammar." The phrase "as effectively as" is used for clarity and precision.
"For instance, understanding colloquial expression through grammatical rules is impossible compared to the ease in spoken English." -> "For example, comprehending colloquial expressions through grammatical rules is challenging compared to the ease of understanding in spoken English."
Explanation: "For instance" is replaced with "For example" for formality. "Comprehending" is more formal than "understanding," and "challenging" is a more accurate term than "impossible."
"There are numerous professions with high salary requiring individuals having good command of spoken English such interpreters or flight attendants." -> "Several high-paying professions, such as interpreters or flight attendants, necessitate individuals to possess a strong command of spoken English."
Explanation: "Numerous" is replaced with "several" for a more precise term. "Requiring individuals having" is replaced with "necessitate individuals to possess" for formality and clarity.
"Impossibility for these jobs is absolute if mastery in English grammar instead of oral communication." -> "Attaining these jobs is virtually impossible without proficiency in spoken English rather than solely relying on English grammar."
Explanation: "Impossibility for" is replaced with "Attaining," and "is absolute if" is replaced with "without" for a more formal and clear expression. "Proficiency in" is used instead of "mastery" for a more measured tone.
"Consequently, a person devoting time to learning spoken English can have stable job with high income catering for personal life, which is far from easy with grammar studiers." -> "Consequently, an individual dedicating time to acquiring spoken English can secure a stable job with a high income, catering to personal life, a task that is considerably challenging for those focusing solely on grammar studies."
Explanation: "Devoting time to learning" is replaced with "dedicating time to acquiring" for formality. "Secure" is a more formal term than "have." "Considerably challenging" is more precise than "far from easy," and "those focusing solely on" is used for clarity instead of "with grammar studiers."

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all parts of the prompt. It acknowledges the parental perspective and clearly states the writer’s agreement, providing reasons for the stance throughout the essay. Relevant examples are used to support the argument.
- How to improve: While the essay is comprehensive, there is room for improvement in expanding on the counterargument. A brief acknowledgment of the opposing view and a counterargument can add depth to the essay.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear and consistent position in favor of spoken English. The stance is evident in the introduction, maintained throughout the body paragraphs, and reinforced in the conclusion. Each paragraph contributes to supporting the main idea.
- How to improve: To enhance clarity, consider explicitly stating the main idea in each paragraph’s topic sentence. This can provide a clear roadmap for the reader and strengthen the overall structure.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents, extends, and supports ideas adequately. Examples are used to illustrate and elaborate on the points made. The connection between the examples and the main argument is well-established.
- How to improve: To further enhance the essay, consider incorporating more varied and nuanced examples. This can add depth to the analysis and demonstrate a broader understanding of the topic.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the importance of spoken English over grammar. However, there are a few instances where the connection between the examples and the main argument could be more explicit.
- How to improve: Ensure that each example directly relates to the main argument and reinforces the importance of spoken English. This will help maintain a more cohesive and focused essay.

Overall Feedback:
The essay is well-written and effectively argues in favor of spoken English over English grammar. To further improve, consider incorporating a counterargument for a more balanced perspective and providing more varied examples to enhance the depth of the analysis. The structure and clarity of the essay are strong, contributing to an overall impressive response to the prompt.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a logical organization by presenting a clear introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each paragraph contributes to the overall argument coherently. For instance, the introduction introduces the stance, body paragraphs elaborate on the benefits of spoken English, and the conclusion summarizes the main points effectively.
- How to improve: While the logical flow is generally strong, consider reinforcing the connections between paragraphs. Use transitional phrases to guide the reader through the essay more smoothly. This could enhance the overall coherence.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate distinct ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect, such as the benefits of spoken English and its practical applications. The structure within paragraphs is clear, with a topic sentence introducing the main idea and supporting details following logically.
- How to improve: Continue to ensure that each paragraph has a clear central idea and that sentences within the paragraph directly relate to that idea. Consider varying sentence structure for added variety and engagement.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, including transition words and phrases such as "for example," "in contrast," and "in addition." These contribute to the overall coherence by signaling relationships between ideas.
- How to improve: While cohesive devices are used, strive for even more diversity. Incorporate synonyms for common connectors, such as "moreover" or "furthermore," to add sophistication. Ensure that the use of cohesive devices enhances rather than interrupts the flow of ideas.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong coherence and cohesion, earning a Band Score of 7. To improve further, focus on reinforcing connections between paragraphs, maintaining clarity within each paragraph, and diversifying the use of cohesive devices for a more nuanced and sophisticated expression of ideas.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary. While it includes some varied expressions (e.g., "negotiate deals," "boosting career growth," "colloquial expression"), there is room for improvement. Some repetition of words and phrases is noticeable, and certain expressions could be more nuanced.
- How to improve: To enhance the lexical range, consider incorporating a broader spectrum of vocabulary related to the essay’s topic. For instance, explore synonyms for frequently used terms and introduce more specific and diverse language where appropriate. The inclusion of idiomatic expressions or figurative language can further enrich the vocabulary.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary with precision, but there are instances where word choices could be more precise. For example, in the phrase "with his proficiency in spoken English," the term "proficiency" could be replaced with a more specific descriptor to convey a clearer meaning.
- How to improve: Focus on selecting words that precisely convey the intended meaning. Be attentive to the context and ensure that each word contributes to the overall clarity and specificity of the message. In the mentioned example, using "fluency" or "eloquence" instead of "proficiency" may enhance precision.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits correct spelling, but there are a few instances where errors occur. For instance, "Impossibility for these jobs is absolute" should be revised to "Impossibility for these jobs is absolutely."
- How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, proofread the essay carefully. Pay close attention to common grammatical constructions and review the essay systematically. Utilize spell-check tools and consider seeking feedback from peers or educators to identify and correct spelling errors effectively.

In summary, the essay presents a solid foundation in lexical resource but would benefit from a more diverse vocabulary, precision in word choice, and heightened attention to spelling accuracy. Strengthening these aspects will contribute to an overall improvement in the lexical resource, potentially elevating the band score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences. There is evidence of a mix of simple and complex sentence constructions, contributing to overall coherence. For example, "Learning spoken English is crucial because it helps users communicate with more articulation and fluency," showcases a complex sentence structure.
- How to improve: To further enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider incorporating more compound-complex sentences. Introduce sentence structures that involve subordinate clauses to add depth and complexity to your ideas. For instance, instead of relying solely on straightforward cause-and-effect structures, experiment with more intricate sentence formations to engage the reader.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay displays a commendable level of grammatical accuracy. However, there are a few instances where minor grammatical errors and awkward phrasing could be improved. For instance, the phrase "With these benefits, conversation with English people is more natural" could be refined to "These benefits make conversations with English speakers more natural." Additionally, some issues with subject-verb agreement and article usage are noticeable, such as "does not help individuals grasp the nuance of English like oral communication."
- How to improve: Pay close attention to subject-verb agreement and article usage to refine grammatical accuracy. Proofread your essay to catch minor errors and awkward phrasing. Consider seeking feedback from peers or utilizing grammar-checking tools to identify and rectify specific grammatical issues. This meticulous approach will contribute to an even higher level of grammatical precision in your writing.

Overall, while the essay exhibits a commendable command of grammatical range and accuracy, refining sentence structures and addressing minor grammatical errors will elevate the essay to an even higher level.

Bài sửa mẫu

I align with certain parental viewpoints that stress the significance of spoken English over English grammar. I uphold this agreement due to the superior enhancement of communication skills and the practicality offered by spoken English.

Acquiring spoken English is vital as it enables users to communicate with greater articulation and fluency. These advantages make conversations with English speakers more natural, allowing users to express themselves with greater confidence. For example, comprehending colloquial expressions through grammatical rules is challenging compared to the ease of understanding in spoken English.

In contrast, mastering grammar rules only develops your linguistic proficiency and does not assist individuals in grasping the nuances of English as effectively as oral communication. Several high-paying professions, such as interpreters or flight attendants, necessitate individuals to possess a strong command of spoken English. Attaining these jobs is virtually impossible without proficiency in spoken English rather than solely relying on English grammar.

Consequently, an individual dedicating time to acquiring spoken English can secure a stable job with a high income, catering to personal life—a task that is considerably challenging for those focusing solely on grammar studies.

In conclusion, I agree with certain parental perspectives regarding the significance of spoken English over English grammar due to the practical applications and the development in communication ability it provides.