Some feel that students should not have to take standardized tests in school. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some feel that students should not have to take standardized tests in school.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There are several individuals assume that communal examinations for students is unecessary. In my perspective, I disagree with this opinion because examinations serve as effective measurements for teachers to evaluate learners' abilities. In addition, tests provide motivations for students to study seriously in order to get high scores in schools.
First and foremost, standardized tests in schools help teachers in determining the ability of all students and their discipline in learning. Normally pupils who study hard and concentrate on lessons in classes often achieve higher scores in exams compared to lazy ones. As a results, instructors could classify students into groups regarding their marks and have appropriate interventions for slow learners to keep up with others thereafter. Furthermore, students' self-study abilities could be enhanced because after each communal exam, they can assess their current knowledge, indicating their weakness and improve it in the next tests.
On the other hand, standardized tests in schools can create pressure for learners to study seriously. If tthere is no examination in schools, students will be lazier and they have no rational motivation to acquire more achievements in learnings. In contrast, communal tests drive them to study harder to pass an exam. Additionally, students who are failed might pay for an extra tuition to retake the tests, making examinations in schools become motivations for learners to study.
In conclusion, standardized tests are necessary for both teachers and learners to evaluate their abilities in learning as well as to propose suitable solutions for each pupil to improve their scores in the future.
Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng
Errors and Improvements:
-
"There are several individuals assume" -> "Several individuals believe"
Explanation: "There are" is redundant here. "Several individuals believe" provides a clearer and more direct expression of the idea. -
"In my perspective" -> "From my perspective"
Explanation: "In my perspective" is a common colloquial phrase. "From my perspective" is more formal and precise for academic writing. -
"examinations serve as effective measurements" -> "examinations serve as effective assessments"
Explanation: "Measurements" could imply a quantitative assessment rather than the comprehensive evaluation exams provide. "Assessments" is a more accurate term in this context. -
"motivations for students to study seriously" -> "incentives for students to study diligently"
Explanation: "Motivations" is a bit general and informal. "Incentives" is more formal and implies a more structured approach to encouraging serious study habits. -
"First and foremost" -> "Primarily"
Explanation: "First and foremost" is somewhat informal. "Primarily" serves the same purpose in a more academically appropriate manner. -
"Normally pupils who study hard and concentrate on lessons" -> "Typically, students who diligently study and focus on lessons"
Explanation: "Normally" and "pupils" are a bit informal. "Typically" and "students" are more appropriate for academic writing. Additionally, "diligently study" and "focus on lessons" provide clearer and more precise descriptions. -
"As a results" -> "As a result"
Explanation: "As a results" contains a grammatical error. "As a result" is the correct singular form. -
"marks" -> "grades"
Explanation: "Marks" can be seen as more colloquial. "Grades" is a more formal term for academic assessments. -
"students’ self-study abilities could be enhanced" -> "students’ self-directed learning abilities could be enhanced"
Explanation: "Self-study" is a bit informal. "Self-directed learning" is a more precise and formal term. -
"after each communal exam" -> "following each standardized exam"
Explanation: "Communal" is an unusual choice here. "Standardized" is more commonly used in academic contexts to refer to institutional exams. -
"indicating their weakness" -> "identifying their weaknesses"
Explanation: "Indicating" is less precise. "
Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Task Response: 6
-
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay responds to the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument. It acknowledges the opposing viewpoint but clearly states the writer’s disagreement and provides reasons for it.
- How to improve: To enhance this aspect, ensure that the response fully addresses all parts of the question by exploring nuances and potential counterarguments more thoroughly. Incorporating specific examples or scenarios could further strengthen the argumentation.
-
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent stance throughout, arguing against the idea that students should not have to take standardized tests.
- How to improve: To improve clarity, maintain a strong and clearly articulated thesis statement that guides the entire essay. Use topic sentences in each paragraph to reinforce the main argument and avoid ambiguity or mixed messages.
-
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to the benefits of standardized tests for teachers’ evaluations and student motivation. It offers examples and explanations to support these points.
- How to improve: To enhance idea development, delve deeper into each point by providing more detailed examples, statistics, or studies that demonstrate the effectiveness or drawbacks of standardized testing. Connect ideas logically to create a more cohesive argument.
-
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay predominantly stays on topic by discussing the necessity and benefits of standardized tests in schools.
- How to improve: Avoid minor digressions or repetitive statements that do not contribute significantly to the main argument. Ensure that each paragraph directly relates to the central theme of standardized testing in schools.
Overall, the essay effectively addresses the prompt with a clear stance and provides reasonable arguments supported by examples. To improve the score and depth of analysis, consider refining the organization, expanding on ideas, and incorporating more varied vocabulary and sentence structures for a more sophisticated presentation.
Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6
-
Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information. It starts with an introduction where the writer presents their opinion and outlines their arguments. Each body paragraph addresses a different aspect of the topic: the benefits of standardized tests for teachers and students’ motivation to study seriously. Finally, the conclusion restates the writer’s opinion and summarizes the main points. However, there are some instances of awkward phrasing and repetition ("students’ abilities and their discipline in learning" could be streamlined, for example).
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, the writer should focus on coherence within and between sentences. This can be achieved by ensuring smooth transitions between ideas and avoiding unnecessary repetition. Additionally, a clear topic sentence at the beginning of each paragraph can help guide the reader through the essay’s structure.
-
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific argument or aspect of the topic. However, the paragraphs could be more effectively structured. For instance, the second paragraph covers both the benefits of standardized tests for teachers and students’ self-study abilities, which could be divided into separate paragraphs for clarity.
- How to improve: The writer should aim for clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph to indicate the main point. Additionally, each paragraph should focus on a single idea or argument, with supporting evidence and examples provided to strengthen the argument.
-
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay uses some cohesive devices, such as transition words ("First and foremost," "On the other hand," "In conclusion"). However, there is room for improvement in the variety and effectiveness of these devices. Some transitions could be smoother, and there is a lack of cohesive devices within paragraphs to connect ideas.
- How to improve: To enhance cohesion, the writer should incorporate a wider range of cohesive devices, such as pronouns (e.g., "this," "these"), conjunctions (e.g., "however," "furthermore"), and transitional phrases (e.g., "in addition to," "on the contrary"). Additionally, using parallel structure within sentences and paragraphs can improve coherence and readability.
Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7
Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7
- Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, including words like "communal," "interventions," "enhanced," and "achievements." However, there are instances where simpler or more common words could be used to improve clarity and sophistication. For example, "normally pupils" could be replaced with "typically, students," and "self-study abilities" could be changed to "self-learning skills."
- How to improve: To enhance your lexical resource, try to incorporate a broader range of vocabulary, including more advanced and nuanced terms where appropriate. Additionally, focus on using vocabulary that fits the context and enhances the overall clarity and sophistication of your writing.
- Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary appropriately but could benefit from more precise word choices in some instances. For example, "normal pupils" could be replaced with "dedicated students," and "drive them to study harder" could be "motivate them to study more diligently."
- How to improve: To improve precision, carefully consider the exact meaning of the words you use and ensure they convey your intended message accurately. Additionally, use a thesaurus to find synonyms that may convey your meaning more precisely.
- Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains several spelling errors, such as "unecessary" (unnecessary), "tthere" (there), and "learnings" (learning). These errors detract from the overall quality of the writing.
- How to improve: To improve spelling accuracy, consider using spell-checking tools and reviewing your writing carefully before submission. Additionally, practice spelling common words and pay attention to spelling patterns in English.
Overall, your essay demonstrates a good level of vocabulary use, but there is room for improvement in terms of range, precision, and spelling accuracy. Focus on using a diverse range of vocabulary, choosing words carefully for precision, and ensuring correct spelling to enhance the overall quality of your writing.
Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6
Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6
-
Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. There is an attempt to use subordinate clauses ("In addition," "Furthermore," "On the other hand"), although some constructions lack clarity or correctness ("students who are failed might pay for an extra tuition"). However, more sophisticated structures such as conditional sentences, relative clauses, or passive voice are largely absent.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety and effectiveness of sentence structures, incorporate more complex sentence constructions. Introduce conditional sentences to express hypothetical situations ("If standardized tests were abolished, students might feel less pressure…"). Utilize relative clauses to provide additional information about nouns ("Students who excel in standardized tests often have greater opportunities…"). Additionally, consider employing passive voice to vary sentence structure and focus ("Extra tuition might be sought by students who fail…").
-
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay demonstrates a satisfactory level of grammatical accuracy. However, there are several instances of grammatical errors throughout the essay. For example, "There are several individuals assume" should be "There are several individuals who assume," and "tthere" should be "there." Additionally, there are punctuation errors, such as missing commas before introductory phrases ("First and foremost," "On the other hand").
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to subject-verb agreement, article usage, and sentence structure. Proofread the essay carefully to identify and correct errors in grammar and punctuation. Review common grammatical rules and seek opportunities to practice writing to reinforce proper usage. Additionally, consider seeking feedback from peers or instructors to identify areas for improvement and receive targeted guidance on specific grammar and punctuation issues.
Bài sửa mẫu
There are several individuals who believe that communal examinations for students are unnecessary. In my perspective, I disagree with this opinion because examinations serve as effective assessments for teachers to evaluate learners’ abilities. In addition, tests provide incentives for students to study diligently in order to achieve high scores in schools.
Primarily, standardized tests in schools help teachers determine the abilities of all students and their discipline in learning. Typically, students who diligently study and focus on lessons in classes often achieve higher scores in exams compared to lazy ones. As a result, instructors could classify students into groups regarding their grades and have appropriate interventions for slow learners to keep up with others thereafter. Furthermore, students’ self-directed learning abilities could be enhanced because following each standardized exam, they can assess their current knowledge, identifying their weaknesses and improve them in the next tests.
On the other hand, standardized tests in schools can create pressure for learners to study seriously. If there are no examinations in schools, students will be lazier and they will have no rational motivation to acquire more achievements in learning. In contrast, communal tests drive them to study harder to pass an exam. Additionally, students who fail might pay for extra tuition to retake the tests, making examinations in schools become motivations for learners to study.
In conclusion, standardized tests are necessary for both teachers and learners to evaluate their abilities in learning as well as to propose suitable solutions for each pupil to improve their scores in the future.
Phản hồi