Some people think that large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives, compared to other workers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In today's corporate landscape, some believe that large companies should offer significantly higher salaries to their CEOs and executives compared to other employees. While I acknowledge that top executives have substantial responsibilities and expertise that may justify higher compensation, I believe that this practice should be balanced to maintain fairness within the organization.

On one hand, the roles of CEOs and executives come with a considerable amount of responsibility and expertise. These individuals are often responsible for making critical decisions that can determine the success or failure of the company. They typically possess years of experience and advanced academic qualifications, which can justify a higher salary. For instance, a CEO must have a deep understanding of the market, strong leadership skills, and the ability to manage crises effectively. Therefore, offering competitive compensation is essential to attract and retain such talent, which is vital for the company's long-term success.

On the other hand, the significant income gap between executives and regular employees can lead to dissatisfaction and a toxic work culture. When employees feel that their contributions are undervalued compared to those of top management, it can result in decreased motivation and higher turnover rates. Research has shown that excessive pay disparity can erode trust and loyalty within a company. For example, if a CEO earns 80 times more than the average worker, it may foster feelings of resentment and unfairness, ultimately affecting overall productivity and morale.

Moreover, maintaining a reasonable pay structure can promote a more cohesive and positive work environment. Companies that implement fair compensation practices often see higher levels of employee satisfaction and loyalty. This can lead to increased productivity and a more harmonious workplace. For instance, performance-based bonuses and profit-sharing schemes for all employees, rather than just top executives, can help bridge the income gap and recognize the contributions of everyone.

In conclusion, while it is essential to compensate CEOs and executives fairly for their substantial responsibilities and expertise, it is equally important to maintain a reasonable pay structure within the company. Striking a balance between rewarding top talent and ensuring fairness for all employees is crucial for fostering a positive and productive work environment.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"In today’s corporate landscape" -> "In the contemporary corporate environment"
Explanation: "Contemporary" is a more precise and formal term than "today’s," enhancing the academic tone of the essay.
"some believe" -> "some argue"
Explanation: "Argue" is more specific and academically appropriate than "believe," implying a more informed and reasoned perspective.
"significantly higher salaries" -> "substantially higher remuneration"
Explanation: "Remuneration" is a more formal and precise term than "salaries," aligning better with the academic style.
"substantial responsibilities and expertise" -> "significant responsibilities and expertise"
Explanation: "Significant" is more commonly used in academic contexts to describe importance or magnitude, making it a more natural choice here.
"should be balanced" -> "should be balanced"
Explanation: The phrase "should be balanced" is grammatically correct and maintains the formal tone of the essay.
"On one hand" -> "On the one hand"
Explanation: "On the one hand" is the correct idiomatic expression for introducing contrasting ideas in formal writing.
"considerable amount of responsibility" -> "substantial responsibility"
Explanation: "Substantial" is more concise and formal than "considerable amount of," improving the flow and precision of the sentence.
"advanced academic qualifications" -> "advanced educational qualifications"
Explanation: "Educational qualifications" is a more specific term in the context of academic and professional credentials.
"must have" -> "should possess"
Explanation: "Should possess" is more formal and less absolute than "must have," which is more suitable for academic discussions.
"offering competitive compensation" -> "offering competitive remuneration"
Explanation: "Remuneration" is more specific and formal than "compensation," aligning better with the context of employment and salary.
"can lead to" -> "may lead to"
Explanation: "May" is more cautious and academically appropriate than "can," which is more definitive and less suitable for hypothetical discussions.
"Research has shown" -> "Studies have demonstrated"
Explanation: "Studies have demonstrated" is a more precise and formal way to introduce research findings in academic writing.
"excessive pay disparity" -> "excessive pay disparities"
Explanation: "Disparities" is the plural form necessary when referring to multiple instances of unequal pay.
"foster feelings of resentment and unfairness" -> "promote feelings of resentment and a sense of unfairness"
Explanation: "Promote" is more formal than "foster," and "a sense of unfairness" is a more precise and formal expression than "feelings of unfairness."
"maintaining a reasonable pay structure" -> "maintaining a fair compensation structure"
Explanation: "Fair compensation structure" is more specific and formal than "reasonable pay structure," emphasizing the importance of equity in compensation.
"performance-based bonuses and profit-sharing schemes" -> "performance-based bonuses and profit-sharing initiatives"
Explanation: "Initiatives" is a more formal term than "schemes," fitting better in an academic context.
"recognize the contributions of everyone" -> "acknowledge the contributions of all employees"
Explanation: "Acknowledge" is more formal than "recognize," and "all employees" is more specific than "everyone," enhancing clarity and formality.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by discussing both sides of the argument regarding whether large companies should pay higher salaries to CEOs and executives compared to other workers. The writer acknowledges the justification for higher salaries due to the responsibilities and expertise of executives while also presenting a counterargument about the negative implications of significant pay disparities. This balanced approach demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
- How to improve: To enhance the response further, the writer could explicitly state their position in the introduction and conclusion. While the essay presents a balanced view, it could benefit from a clearer indication of the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the notion of higher salaries for executives. Adding a more definitive stance could strengthen the overall argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position by acknowledging the necessity of higher salaries for executives while also emphasizing the importance of fairness within the organization. The writer’s position is articulated well, particularly in the conclusion, where they reiterate the need for balance. However, there are moments where the argument could be more assertively stated, particularly in the introduction.
- How to improve: To improve clarity and consistency, the writer should consider explicitly stating their position in the introduction. Phrases like "I partially agree" or "I believe that…" can help clarify the stance from the outset. Additionally, reinforcing this position throughout the essay with consistent language can help maintain focus.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents well-structured ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The use of examples, such as the potential impact of pay disparity on employee morale and productivity, effectively supports the points made. The writer also extends their argument by discussing alternative compensation methods, such as performance-based bonuses, which adds depth to the discussion.
- How to improve: To further enhance the support for ideas, the writer could incorporate more specific examples or data to substantiate claims. For instance, referencing studies or statistics on employee satisfaction in relation to pay disparity could strengthen the argument. Additionally, exploring counterarguments more thoroughly could provide a more rounded discussion.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, addressing the implications of salary disparities between executives and regular employees. The writer does not deviate from the main question and consistently relates their points back to the central theme of fairness and compensation.
- How to improve: To ensure continued focus, the writer should avoid introducing overly broad statements that might distract from the main argument. For instance, while discussing the responsibilities of CEOs, it’s important to tie those responsibilities back to the question of salary comparison rather than allowing the discussion to drift into general corporate responsibilities.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and effectively balances arguments for and against higher executive salaries. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can elevate their essay to an even higher level of clarity and persuasiveness.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay is well-structured, presenting a clear argument that acknowledges both sides of the issue regarding CEO compensation. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion, and each paragraph builds upon the previous one, leading to a logical progression of ideas. For example, the first body paragraph discusses the justification for high salaries due to responsibilities, while the second body paragraph counters this by addressing the negative implications of income disparity. This logical flow enhances the reader’s understanding of the argument.
- How to improve: To further enhance logical organization, consider using more explicit linking phrases between paragraphs to guide the reader through the argument. For instance, phrases like "In addition to the responsibilities of executives," could be used to transition between the justification for high salaries and the discussion of fairness in compensation.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate distinct ideas, each focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction, two body paragraphs, and conclusion are clearly delineated, which aids readability. Each paragraph contains a clear topic sentence that outlines its main idea, such as the responsibilities of CEOs in the first body paragraph and the consequences of pay disparity in the second.
- How to improve: To improve paragraphing further, ensure that each paragraph not only starts with a clear topic sentence but also ends with a concluding sentence that summarizes the main point and links it back to the overall argument. This would reinforce the connection between paragraphs and the central thesis.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as "on one hand," "on the other hand," and "moreover," which help to clarify the relationships between ideas and arguments. These devices effectively signal shifts in perspective and add coherence to the essay. Additionally, examples provided, such as the comparison of CEO salaries to average worker salaries, serve as cohesive elements that strengthen the argument.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating a wider range of linking words and phrases. For instance, using "furthermore," "in contrast," or "consequently" can add variety and depth to the transitions between points. Additionally, ensure that cohesive devices are used appropriately and not excessively, as overuse can lead to awkward phrasing.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of coherence and cohesion, effectively presenting a balanced argument. By focusing on enhancing transitions between paragraphs, refining concluding sentences, and diversifying cohesive devices, the essay can achieve even greater clarity and fluidity in its presentation.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary, utilizing a variety of terms and phrases relevant to the topic. For instance, words like "corporate landscape," "critical decisions," and "toxic work culture" showcase a sophisticated understanding of the subject matter. The use of phrases such as "substantial responsibilities" and "advanced academic qualifications" further illustrates the writer’s ability to convey complex ideas effectively.
- How to improve: To elevate the lexical resource even further, the writer could incorporate more synonyms and varied expressions. For example, instead of repeating "higher salary," alternatives like "increased remuneration" or "enhanced compensation" could be used. Additionally, introducing some idiomatic expressions or less common vocabulary could enrich the essay’s overall language.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary accurately, with terms like "fairness," "dissatisfaction," and "cohesive" used appropriately in context. However, there are moments where the precision could be improved. For instance, the phrase "excessive pay disparity" is effective, but the term "toxic work culture" could be seen as somewhat vague without further elaboration on what constitutes "toxic."
- How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should aim to clarify and specify terms that might be interpreted differently. For example, expanding on what "toxic work culture" entails or providing specific examples of "fair compensation practices" would strengthen the argument and improve clarity.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "responsibility," "expertise," and "motivation" are spelled correctly throughout the text, contributing to the overall professionalism of the writing.
- How to improve: While spelling is already strong, the writer can maintain this level by consistently proofreading their work and utilizing tools like spell checkers. Additionally, practicing writing with a focus on commonly misspelled words can further solidify this skill.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a commendable use of vocabulary, with strengths in range and accuracy. To achieve an even higher band score, the writer should focus on diversifying vocabulary, enhancing precision in word choice, and maintaining their excellent spelling standards.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, complex sentences such as "These individuals are often responsible for making critical decisions that can determine the success or failure of the company" effectively convey intricate ideas. Additionally, the use of conditional structures, such as "if a CEO earns 80 times more than the average worker," adds depth to the argument. The writer also employs a mix of simple and compound sentences, which helps maintain reader engagement and clarity.
- How to improve: To further diversify sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases and transition words. For example, beginning sentences with adverbial clauses (e.g., "Given the significant responsibilities of CEOs, it is understandable that…") could enhance the complexity of the writing. Additionally, using more rhetorical questions or exclamatory sentences could add emphasis and engage the reader more effectively.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For instance, the phrase "which can justify a higher salary" is correctly used to provide clarity. Punctuation is generally well-handled, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and enhance readability. However, there is a slight inconsistency in the use of commas in lists, such as in "strong leadership skills, and the ability to manage crises effectively," where the comma before "and" is unnecessary in a simple list.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, the writer should review the rules regarding the Oxford comma and ensure consistency in its application. Additionally, practicing sentence diagramming could help identify and correct any potential run-on sentences or fragments. Regularly revisiting grammar rules, especially concerning subject-verb agreement and verb tenses, will also aid in maintaining high accuracy in future essays.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and presents a balanced argument with a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can further elevate their writing to achieve an even higher level of proficiency.

Bài sửa mẫu

In today’s corporate landscape, some believe that large companies should offer substantially higher remuneration to their CEOs and executives compared to other employees. While I acknowledge that top executives have significant responsibilities and expertise that may justify higher compensation, I believe that this practice should be balanced to maintain fairness within the organization.

On the one hand, the roles of CEOs and executives come with a considerable amount of responsibility and expertise. These individuals are often responsible for making critical decisions that can determine the success or failure of the company. They typically possess years of experience and advanced educational qualifications, which can justify a higher salary. For instance, a CEO must have a deep understanding of the market, strong leadership skills, and the ability to manage crises effectively. Therefore, offering competitive remuneration is essential to attract and retain such talent, which is vital for the company’s long-term success.

On the other hand, the significant income gap between executives and regular employees can lead to dissatisfaction and a toxic work culture. When employees feel that their contributions are undervalued compared to those of top management, it can result in decreased motivation and higher turnover rates. Studies have demonstrated that excessive pay disparities can erode trust and loyalty within a company. For example, if a CEO earns 80 times more than the average worker, it may promote feelings of resentment and a sense of unfairness, ultimately affecting overall productivity and morale.

Moreover, maintaining a fair compensation structure can promote a more cohesive and positive work environment. Companies that implement fair compensation practices often see higher levels of employee satisfaction and loyalty. This can lead to increased productivity and a more harmonious workplace. For instance, performance-based bonuses and profit-sharing initiatives for all employees, rather than just top executives, can help bridge the income gap and acknowledge the contributions of everyone.