Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. Discuss both views and give your opinion

Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the course is useful to an employer. Discuss both views and give your opinion

What roles universities should play in students’ personal and professional growth has been a topic of discussion. While some individuals claim that graduates should be equipped with skills directly related to employment capabilities, others believe that higher education ought to pay attention to providing knowledge with limited connection to the current job market. In my opinion, both these two aspects of knowledge should be simultaneously focused on because they would enable students to develop more comprehensively.
On the one hand, there are some compelling reasons why it may be necessary for universities to be responsible for training students in practical knowledge and skills for their future careers. Specifically, nowadays, higher education could be obtained more easily, which means that there is likely to be an increasingly large number of candidates with high qualifications competing for a limited number of job openings. Therefore, in order to be a standout interviewee, individuals should be able to present themselves as staff with various soft skills and specialized knowledge that could benefit their potential company. As a result, if universities make an effort to design and run courses emphasizing usable skills such as communication, presentation, teamwork, marketing skills, it would contribute to a more rounded growth of students, leading to them having the ability to put what they learn in school into practice and shine in their careers.
On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that access to pure knowledge that might be irrelevant to learners’ future career prospects could play a part in their overall development. For example, although theoretical lessons such as psychology, abstract mathematics, and theoretical physics might seem boring and be overlooked by a significant number of students, these subjects would enable them to widen their horizons about the world, enrich their perspectives, and boost their critical thinking. When applying for a job position or working in a competitive environment, they would be able to use these skills to increase their chances of getting hired and generate creative and meaningful ideas. In this way, not only does providing courses on these subjects enhance students’ capabilities, but it could also benefit them professionally in the long run. Therefore, a balance between access to subjects directly regarding future jobs and pure knowledge should be reached so that the young could obtain the best of both worlds.
In conclusion, a bright professional future is more likely to be guaranteed if graduates could be equipped with a combination of theoretical knowledge and applicable skills during their time at universities.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

1. "What roles universities should play" -> "What roles universities should assume"
   Explanation: "Assume" is a more formal and precise term than "play" in this context, aligning better with academic language by emphasizing the responsibilities and actions of universities.

2. "graduates should be equipped with skills directly related to employment capabilities" -> "graduates should be equipped with skills directly applicable to employment capabilities"
   Explanation: "Applicable" is more specific and academically precise than "related," as it directly links the skills to the context of employment.

3. "higher education ought to pay attention to providing knowledge with limited connection to the current job market" -> "higher education should focus on imparting knowledge with limited relevance to the current job market"
   Explanation: "Imparting" is a more formal verb than "providing," and "relevance" is more precise than "connection," enhancing the academic tone.

4. "both these two aspects of knowledge" -> "both these two aspects of knowledge"
   Explanation: The phrase "both these two" is redundant and informal. Simplifying it to "both these" maintains clarity and formality.

5. "could be obtained more easily" -> "is increasingly accessible"
   Explanation: "Is increasingly accessible" is a more precise and formal way to describe the ease of obtaining higher education, avoiding the colloquial tone of "could be obtained more easily."

6. "there is likely to be an increasingly large number of candidates with high qualifications competing for a limited number of job openings" -> "there is an escalating number of highly qualified candidates competing for a limited number of job openings"
   Explanation: "Escalating" is a more formal term than "increasingly large," and "highly qualified" is more specific than "high qualifications," enhancing the academic tone.

7. "present themselves as staff with various soft skills and specialized knowledge" -> "present themselves as professionals with diverse soft skills and specialized knowledge"
   Explanation: "Professionals" is more specific and formal than "staff," and "diverse" is more precise than "various."

8. "make an effort to design and run courses emphasizing usable skills" -> "strive to design and implement courses focusing on practical skills"
   Explanation: "Strive" and "implement" are more formal and precise than "make an effort" and "run," respectively, and "practical skills" is more specific than "usable skills."

9. "pure knowledge that might be irrelevant to learners’ future career prospects" -> "theoretical knowledge that may be unrelated to learners’ future career prospects"
   Explanation: "Theoretical" is a more precise term than "pure," and "unrelated" is more formal than "irrelevant."

10. "might seem boring and be overlooked" -> "may appear dull and be overlooked"
    Explanation: "Appear" and "dull" are more formal and academically appropriate than "seem" and "boring," respectively.

11. "boost their critical thinking" -> "enhance their critical thinking"
    Explanation: "Enhance" is a more formal synonym for "boost," fitting better in an academic context.

12. "increase their chances of getting hired" -> "improve their chances of being hired"
    Explanation: "Improve" is a more formal and precise term than "increase" in this context, aligning better with academic language.

13. "a balance between access to subjects directly regarding future jobs and pure knowledge" -> "a balance between access to subjects directly relevant to future careers and theoretical knowledge"
    Explanation: "Relevant" is more precise than "regarding," and "theoretical" is more specific than "pure," enhancing the academic tone.

14. "a bright professional future is more likely to be guaranteed" -> "a promising professional future is more likely to be ensured"
    Explanation: "Promising" is a more formal synonym for "bright," and "ensured" is more precise than "guaranteed" in this context, fitting the academic style better.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

• Answer All Parts of the Question:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both views regarding the role of universities in preparing graduates for the workplace versus providing knowledge for its own sake. The introduction clearly outlines the two perspectives, and the body paragraphs discuss each viewpoint in detail. The author presents arguments for the necessity of practical skills in the first body paragraph and acknowledges the value of theoretical knowledge in the second. The conclusion succinctly reiterates the importance of a balanced approach, which aligns well with the prompt’s requirement to discuss both views and provide an opinion.
  • How to improve: To enhance the response further, the essay could benefit from more specific examples or case studies that illustrate the benefits of both approaches. For instance, mentioning specific universities that have successfully integrated both practical and theoretical knowledge into their curricula could strengthen the argument and provide a more comprehensive answer.

• Present a Clear Position Throughout:

  • Detailed explanation: The author maintains a clear position throughout the essay, advocating for a balanced approach to education that incorporates both practical skills and theoretical knowledge. This stance is consistently supported by the arguments presented in each paragraph. The use of phrases like "in my opinion" clearly indicates the author’s viewpoint, and the conclusion reinforces this position effectively.
  • How to improve: While the position is clear, the essay could benefit from a more explicit statement of the author’s opinion earlier in the introduction. For example, stating that a combination of both approaches is essential right at the beginning would set a stronger foundation for the argument and guide the reader more effectively through the discussion.

• Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents and supports ideas well, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the discussion. The first body paragraph discusses the need for practical skills, supported by the argument that these skills help graduates stand out in a competitive job market. The second body paragraph extends the discussion by highlighting the importance of theoretical knowledge for personal development and critical thinking. However, some points could be elaborated further, such as providing more detailed examples of how theoretical knowledge can be applied in real-world scenarios.
  • How to improve: To improve the support for ideas, the author could include more concrete examples or statistics that illustrate the benefits of both practical skills and theoretical knowledge. For instance, citing studies that show how employers value certain soft skills or how theoretical knowledge has led to innovation in various fields would enhance the argument’s credibility.

• Stay on Topic:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, discussing the roles of universities in preparing graduates for the workforce and providing knowledge for its own sake. The author does not deviate from the main topic and consistently relates back to the prompt in each paragraph. This adherence to the topic contributes to the overall coherence of the essay.
  • How to improve: While the essay stays on topic, ensuring that each point made directly ties back to the prompt can further enhance focus. The author could explicitly connect the discussion points back to the implications for students and employers, reinforcing the relevance of each argument to the central question of the essay. This would also help in maintaining a strong thematic coherence throughout the essay.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

• Organize Information Logically:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear and logical organization of ideas. The introduction effectively sets the stage for the discussion by outlining the two opposing views regarding the role of universities. Each body paragraph is dedicated to one of the perspectives, which allows for a balanced exploration of both sides. The transition from discussing the necessity of practical skills to the importance of theoretical knowledge is smooth, demonstrating a coherent progression of ideas. For instance, the use of phrases like "On the one hand" and "On the other hand" clearly delineates the contrasting views.
  • How to improve: To enhance the logical flow further, the writer could consider adding a brief summary sentence at the end of each body paragraph that encapsulates the main point discussed. This would reinforce the connection between the ideas and the overall argument, making it easier for the reader to follow the writer’s line of reasoning.

• Use Paragraphs:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, which contributes to its clarity. Each paragraph has a clear focus: the first discusses the need for practical skills, the second addresses the value of theoretical knowledge, and the conclusion summarizes the argument. The paragraphing is consistent, and the length of each paragraph is appropriate, allowing for a thorough exploration of each point without overwhelming the reader.
  • How to improve: While the paragraph structure is solid, the writer could benefit from ensuring that each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea. This would not only improve readability but also help the reader quickly grasp the focus of each paragraph. For example, starting the second body paragraph with a sentence like "Conversely, the pursuit of theoretical knowledge is equally vital for holistic student development" would reinforce the contrast between the two views.

• Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as linking words and phrases (e.g., "therefore," "for example," "in conclusion") that help to connect ideas and maintain the flow of the argument. The use of cohesive devices contributes to the clarity of the essay, making it easy for the reader to follow the writer’s thoughts. Additionally, the writer employs a range of cohesive devices effectively, which enhances the overall coherence of the text.
  • How to improve: To further diversify the use of cohesive devices, the writer could incorporate more varied transitional phrases and synonyms to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "on the one hand" and "on the other hand," the writer might consider alternatives such as "in contrast" or "alternatively." This would not only enrich the language but also demonstrate a wider range of vocabulary and cohesion techniques, which is beneficial for achieving a higher band score.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and coherent, effectively addressing the prompt while maintaining a clear and logical flow of ideas. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can enhance the clarity and depth of their argument, potentially achieving an even higher score in Coherence and Cohesion.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

• Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good range of vocabulary, with terms such as "compelling reasons," "specialized knowledge," and "critical thinking" effectively conveying complex ideas. The use of phrases like "standout interviewee" and "rounded growth" showcases an ability to articulate nuanced arguments. However, there are instances of repetition, particularly with terms like "knowledge" and "skills," which could be varied to enhance the lexical diversity.
  • How to improve: To improve lexical variety, the writer could substitute synonyms or related phrases for overused terms. For example, instead of repeating "knowledge," alternatives such as "understanding," "insight," or "information" could be employed. Additionally, incorporating more academic vocabulary or idiomatic expressions could further enrich the essay.

• Use Vocabulary Precisely:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary accurately, but there are moments where word choice could be more precise. For instance, the phrase "staff with various soft skills" could be better articulated as "candidates with a diverse skill set." This would clarify that the focus is on the graduates rather than staff in a general sense. Additionally, the term "pure knowledge" may come across as vague; specifying "theoretical knowledge" or "abstract concepts" would enhance clarity.
  • How to improve: To enhance precision, the writer should focus on context when selecting vocabulary. Using more specific terms that directly relate to the subject matter will help convey ideas more clearly. Engaging with academic texts or resources that provide examples of precise language usage in similar contexts could be beneficial.

• Use Correct Spelling:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay displays a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "psychology," "mathematics," and "communication" are spelled correctly, reflecting a strong command of standard English spelling conventions.
  • How to improve: While the spelling is accurate, the writer should maintain this standard by proofreading their work for any potential typographical errors. Regular practice with spelling exercises or using tools like spell check can also help reinforce this strength. Additionally, expanding vocabulary through reading can naturally enhance spelling skills as the writer becomes more familiar with word forms.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid command of lexical resource, achieving a Band Score of 7. By focusing on expanding vocabulary range, improving precision in word choice, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can work towards achieving an even higher band score in future writing tasks.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

• Use a Wide Range of Structures:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, complex sentences such as "While some individuals claim that graduates should be equipped with skills directly related to employment capabilities, others believe that higher education ought to pay attention to providing knowledge with limited connection to the current job market" effectively convey nuanced ideas. Additionally, the use of conditional structures, such as "if universities make an effort to design and run courses emphasizing usable skills," showcases the writer’s ability to express hypothetical scenarios. However, there are instances of repetitive sentence beginnings, particularly in the second paragraph where phrases like "there are some compelling reasons" and "it is important to acknowledge" could be varied further.
  • How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more varied introductory phrases or clauses. For example, instead of starting sentences with "it is important to acknowledge," the writer could use participial phrases or adverbial clauses, such as "Acknowledging the importance of pure knowledge…" This would not only enhance the flow of the essay but also demonstrate a broader range of grammatical structures.

• Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy. Most sentences are correctly constructed, and punctuation is used effectively to clarify meaning. For example, commas are appropriately placed in complex sentences, such as "As a result, if universities make an effort to design and run courses emphasizing usable skills such as communication, presentation, teamwork, marketing skills, it would contribute to a more rounded growth of students." However, there are minor issues with punctuation, such as the lack of a comma before "and" in lists (e.g., "communication, presentation, teamwork, marketing skills"), which can lead to confusion in longer lists.
  • How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, the writer should pay closer attention to punctuation rules, particularly with lists and compound sentences. Regular practice with punctuation exercises and reviewing grammar rules can help solidify these skills. Additionally, proofreading for minor errors before submission can catch issues that may detract from the overall quality of the writing.

Overall, the essay is well-structured and effectively communicates the writer’s ideas. With slight improvements in sentence variety and punctuation accuracy, the essay could achieve an even higher level of grammatical range and accuracy.

Bài sửa mẫu

What roles universities should assume in students’ personal and professional growth has been a topic of discussion. While some individuals claim that graduates should be equipped with skills directly applicable to employment capabilities, others believe that higher education ought to focus on imparting knowledge with limited relevance to the current job market. In my opinion, both these two aspects of knowledge should be simultaneously prioritized, as they would enable students to develop more comprehensively.

On the one hand, there are compelling reasons why it may be necessary for universities to be responsible for training students in practical knowledge and skills for their future careers. Specifically, nowadays, higher education is increasingly accessible, which means that there is an escalating number of highly qualified candidates competing for a limited number of job openings. Therefore, in order to be a standout interviewee, individuals should be able to present themselves as professionals with diverse soft skills and specialized knowledge that could benefit their potential employers. As a result, if universities strive to design and implement courses focusing on practical skills such as communication, presentation, teamwork, and marketing, it would contribute to a more rounded growth of students, leading to them having the ability to apply what they learn in school and excel in their careers.

On the other hand, it is important to acknowledge that access to pure knowledge that might be unrelated to learners’ future career prospects could play a significant role in their overall development. For example, although theoretical lessons such as psychology, abstract mathematics, and theoretical physics may appear dull and be overlooked by a significant number of students, these subjects can help widen their horizons about the world, enrich their perspectives, and enhance their critical thinking. When applying for a job position or working in a competitive environment, they would be able to use these skills to improve their chances of being hired and generate creative and meaningful ideas. In this way, not only does providing courses on these subjects enhance students’ capabilities, but it could also benefit them professionally in the long run. Therefore, a balance between access to subjects directly relevant to future careers and theoretical knowledge should be achieved so that young people can obtain the best of both worlds.

In conclusion, a promising professional future is more likely to be ensured if graduates are equipped with a combination of theoretical knowledge and applicable skills during their time at universities.