Some people want goverments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Some people want goverments to spend money looking for life on other planets. Others, however, think this is a waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Divergent perspectives exist on whether national authorities should allocate public funds for exploring new life on other planets or for addressing various problems on Earth. I strongly endorse the perspective that governments should prioritize addressing issues on Earth rather than allocating funds to the exploration of life on other planets.

Arguably, there are several justifications for the pursuit of extraterrestrial life, primarily encompassing preparedness for catastrophic events. Naturally, various threats exist that could pose an existential threat to human beings on Earth, notably climate change and pandemics. These acute problems could become unmanageable; hence, the pursuit of extraterrestrial life should be undertaken promptly to safeguard humanity against existential threats.

Furthermore, the discovery of extraterrestrial life would facilitate the longstanding goal of space exploration pursued by humans for centuries. However, undoubtedly, billions of dollars have been allocated to space research, yet tangible outcomes remain elusive. This raises questions about the efficacy of investing billions in such endeavors when there are pressing issues on Earth that demand immediate attention.

In contrast to the findings related to alien life, numerous issues have been effectively addressed. Illustrative examples include the management of COVID-19 and the prevention of a potential World War III. Furthermore, if a civilization existed beyond Earth, reaching it would pose another significant challenge, as leaving the solar system is widely considered to be currently unattainable for humans.
Considering the aforementioned points, I align with the notion that allocating public funds to this endeavor is a misallocation, especially when countless issues on Earth have yet to be rectified.

In conclusion, allocating public funds to the exploration of extraterrestrial life in the cosmos may be deemed somewhat acceptable. Having said that, I firmly believe that it is not an opportune time to do so, given the multitude of problems on Earth that should take precedence.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

1. "Divergent perspectives exist" -> "Diverse perspectives exist"
   Explanation: Replacing "Divergent" with "Diverse" maintains formality while avoiding a slightly less formal term. "Diverse" is a more sophisticated synonym in an academic context.

2. "I strongly endorse" -> "I firmly support"
   Explanation: Replacing "strongly endorse" with "firmly support" provides a more formal and nuanced expression of the author’s stance.

3. "Arguably, there are several justifications" -> "Arguably, there are several reasons"
   Explanation: The term "justifications" is slightly informal; using "reasons" maintains formality without compromising clarity.

4. "Naturally, various threats exist" -> "Naturally, various threats are present"
   Explanation: Replacing "exist" with "are present" adds a touch of formality and precision to the statement.

5. "pursuit of extraterrestrial life should be undertaken promptly" -> "exploration of extraterrestrial life should be pursued diligently"
   Explanation: The phrase "undertaken promptly" is somewhat casual; substituting it with "pursued diligently" enhances formality without sacrificing clarity.

6. "yet tangible outcomes remain elusive" -> "yet tangible outcomes have proven elusive"
   Explanation: Adding "have proven" adds a touch of formality and emphasis to the statement.

7. "raises questions about the efficacy" -> "raises questions about the effectiveness"
   Explanation: Replacing "efficacy" with "effectiveness" maintains academic formality and aligns with a more precise term.

8. "In contrast to the findings related to alien life" -> "In contrast to research on extraterrestrial life"
   Explanation: Using "research on extraterrestrial life" is more specific and formal than the generic "findings related to alien life."

9. "Illustrative examples include" -> "Examples include"
   Explanation: Removing "Illustrative" simplifies the expression while maintaining clarity and formality.

10. "if a civilization existed beyond Earth" -> "if an extraterrestrial civilization existed"
    Explanation: Using "extraterrestrial civilization" is more precise and academically specific.

11. "Considering the aforementioned points" -> "Taking the aforementioned points into consideration"
    Explanation: Expanding the phrase to "Taking the aforementioned points into consideration" adds formality and clarity.

12. "it is not an opportune time to do so" -> "it is not an opportune moment to do so"
    Explanation: Replacing "time" with "moment" adds a slightly more formal and nuanced tone.

Note: Overall, these suggestions aim to enhance the formality and precision of the essay without introducing overly complex or obscure terms.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng:

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng:

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng:

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng:

Bài sửa mẫu