The cost of fresh fruits and vegetables is often cited as a barrier to healthy eating . What are the causes and solutions?

It is true that the high cost of fresh fruits and vegetables is regarded as an obstacle to people who want to pursue a healthy way of eating. This essay attempts to shed light on the driving factors behind this tendency before outlining several viable solutions that should be adopted to tackle it.

There are two primary reasons as to why the expense of fresh products render their accessibility to some people. First, organic vegetables cultivated in special conditions and environments usually have exorbitant prices, which means ordinary individuals, especially the underprivileged, would struggle more to purchase food due to their modest income. Second, these kinds of produce require fast transport to maintain their pristine condition until they reach consumers, potentially increasing the transportation costs, compared to that of normal cultivated products such as rice or grains.

To combat this worrying issue, the following essential steps should be taken into account. If people could grow fresh products in local regions, the cost involved would decrease. It is particularly noticeable in Vietnam where a lot of provinces choose to grow locally garden-fresh fruits such as strawberries, carrots, and lettuces to avoid paying delivery costs, thereby encouraging more people to follow healthy eating habits because they do not have to worry about the origin of what they consume. Furthermore, the government should have substantial investment in the organic industry to produce more organic options at a reasonable price, supporting residents to eat healthily.

In conclusion, while there are some underlying motives behind this negative problem due to the shipping fee and accessibility of people to fresh fruits and vegetables, I assert that the aforementioned measures associated with local cultivation and monetary allocation to organic farming should be implemented to address this issue.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"It is true that" -> "It is indeed the case that"
Explanation: "It is indeed the case that" introduces a more formal and assertive tone, which is more suitable for academic writing than the more conversational "It is true that."
"regarded as an obstacle" -> "viewed as a significant obstacle"
Explanation: "Viewed as a significant obstacle" adds specificity and emphasizes the impact of the issue, enhancing the academic tone.
"pursue a healthy way of eating" -> "adopt a healthy diet"
Explanation: "Adopt a healthy diet" is a more precise and commonly used term in academic contexts than "pursue a healthy way of eating."
"render their accessibility" -> "limit their accessibility"
Explanation: "Limit their accessibility" is a clearer and more direct expression than "render their accessibility," which is somewhat awkward and less commonly used.
"exorbitant prices" -> "high prices"
Explanation: While "exorbitant" is not incorrect, "high prices" is more straightforward and commonly used in academic writing to describe elevated costs.
"ordinary individuals, especially the underprivileged" -> "ordinary citizens, particularly those with limited financial resources"
Explanation: "Ordinary citizens" is a more formal term than "ordinary individuals," and "those with limited financial resources" is a more precise description than "the underprivileged."
"would struggle more to purchase food" -> "face greater challenges in purchasing food"
Explanation: "Face greater challenges in purchasing food" is a more formal and precise way to express the difficulties faced by individuals in buying food.
"potentially increasing the transportation costs" -> "potentially increasing transportation costs"
Explanation: Removing "the" before "transportation costs" simplifies and clarifies the sentence, aligning better with formal academic style.
"If people could grow" -> "If individuals could cultivate"
Explanation: "Cultivate" is a more precise term in the context of agriculture than "grow," and "individuals" is preferred over "people" for formal writing.
"a lot of provinces choose to grow" -> "many provinces opt to cultivate"
Explanation: "Opt to cultivate" is more formal and precise than "choose to grow," and "many" is preferred over "a lot" for academic writing.
"to avoid paying delivery costs" -> "to minimize delivery costs"
Explanation: "Minimize" is a more precise and formal term than "avoid," which is somewhat vague in this context.
"substantial investment in the organic industry" -> "significant investment in the organic sector"
Explanation: "Sector" is a more specific term than "industry" in this context, and "significant" is preferred over "substantial" for formal writing.
"at a reasonable price" -> "at a reasonable cost"
Explanation: "Cost" is more specific and appropriate in the context of pricing than "price," which is more commonly associated with retail sales.
"supporting residents to eat healthily" -> "facilitating healthy eating for residents"
Explanation: "Facilitating healthy eating for residents" is a more formal and precise way to express support for healthy eating habits.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both parts of the prompt: it identifies the causes of high costs associated with fresh fruits and vegetables and proposes viable solutions. The first paragraph clearly states that the high prices are due to the costs of organic cultivation and transportation. The solutions presented in the second half of the essay, such as local cultivation and government investment, are relevant and practical.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the essay could provide a more comprehensive exploration of additional causes, such as market demand or seasonal availability, and include a wider range of solutions, such as subsidies for low-income families or community gardens. This would demonstrate a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding the issue.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, asserting that the high cost of fresh produce is a barrier to healthy eating and that specific measures can address this issue. The introduction sets the tone, and the conclusion reinforces the proposed solutions effectively.
- How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, the essay could explicitly state the importance of healthy eating in the introduction and conclusion. Additionally, using transitional phrases to link ideas could enhance the flow and reinforce the central argument.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas clearly, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the prompt. The reasons for high costs are well articulated, and the solutions are relevant and supported by examples, such as the mention of local cultivation in Vietnam.
- How to improve: The essay could benefit from more detailed examples or statistics to support the claims made. For instance, including data on the price differences between organic and non-organic produce could provide a stronger foundation for the argument. Additionally, discussing potential challenges to the proposed solutions would demonstrate critical thinking and a more nuanced understanding of the topic.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, addressing the barriers to healthy eating posed by the cost of fresh produce and suggesting relevant solutions. There are no significant deviations from the topic, and each paragraph contributes to the overall argument.
- How to improve: To ensure even greater focus, the essay could avoid overly broad statements and instead concentrate on specific aspects of the issue. For example, rather than generalizing about "ordinary individuals," it could specify demographics affected by high costs, which would add depth and relevance to the discussion.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task, with clear organization and relevant content. By incorporating more detailed examples, expanding on causes and solutions, and enhancing the clarity of the position, the essay could achieve an even higher band score.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure that logically progresses from the introduction to the body paragraphs and finally to the conclusion. The introduction effectively sets up the topic and outlines the focus of the essay. The body paragraphs are organized into distinct sections addressing the causes and solutions, which enhances the overall clarity. For example, the transition from discussing the reasons for high costs to proposing solutions is smooth and maintains a coherent flow of ideas.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using more explicit transitional phrases between sections. For instance, after discussing the reasons, a phrase like "Having established the causes, it is crucial to explore potential solutions" could further clarify the shift in focus.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the topic. The first body paragraph discusses the causes, while the second addresses solutions. This clear paragraphing aids in readability and comprehension. However, the second body paragraph could benefit from a clearer topic sentence that explicitly states the focus on solutions.
- How to improve: Strengthen the topic sentence of the second body paragraph to clearly indicate that it will discuss solutions. For example, starting with "To address the high costs associated with fresh produce, several solutions can be implemented" would provide a clearer guide for the reader.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as "first," "second," and "furthermore," which help to connect ideas and maintain flow. The use of phrases like "to combat this worrying issue" effectively links the problem to the proposed solutions. However, the essay could benefit from a wider variety of cohesive devices to enhance richness and avoid repetition.
- How to improve: Incorporate a broader range of cohesive devices, such as "in addition," "moreover," or "consequently," to create more nuanced connections between ideas. For example, when transitioning from discussing local cultivation to government investment, using "Moreover, government intervention is also essential" would enhance the cohesiveness of the argument.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of coherence and cohesion, with clear organization and effective use of paragraphs and cohesive devices. By implementing the suggested improvements, the essay could achieve an even higher level of clarity and sophistication.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with terms like "obstacle," "viable solutions," "exorbitant prices," and "pristine condition." However, the vocabulary tends to be somewhat repetitive, particularly in phrases like "fresh products" and "organic vegetables." This limits the overall lexical variety and sophistication expected at a higher band score.
- How to improve: To enhance lexical range, the writer should incorporate synonyms and varied expressions. For example, instead of repeatedly using "fresh products," alternatives like "fresh produce," "locally sourced foods," or "seasonal fruits and vegetables" could be employed. Additionally, using more advanced vocabulary related to health and economics, such as "nutritional value" or "economic barriers," would elevate the essay’s lexical quality.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally uses vocabulary appropriately, but there are instances of imprecise or awkward phrasing. For instance, the phrase "the expense of fresh products render their accessibility to some people" could be clearer. The verb "render" is not used correctly here; it implies a transformation rather than indicating availability.
- How to improve: Focus on clarity and precision in word choice. Instead of "render their accessibility," a more precise phrase could be "limits access to fresh products." Additionally, ensuring that verbs match the subject in terms of number and context will enhance clarity. For example, "the high cost limits access" is clearer than "the expense render their accessibility."
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The spelling in the essay is generally accurate, with no significant errors that impede understanding. Words like "exorbitant," "transport," and "cultivated" are spelled correctly, which reflects a good command of basic spelling rules.
- How to improve: To maintain and improve spelling accuracy, the writer should engage in regular practice, such as writing out vocabulary lists and using spelling apps. Additionally, proofreading the essay for any overlooked errors or typos can help catch minor mistakes before submission.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid foundation in lexical resource, improvements can be made in vocabulary range, precision, and continued attention to spelling. By diversifying vocabulary, ensuring precise usage, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can aim for a higher band score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For instance, the use of complex sentences like "This essay attempts to shed light on the driving factors behind this tendency before outlining several viable solutions that should be adopted to tackle it" showcases the writer’s ability to convey multiple ideas in one sentence. However, there are instances where the sentence structures could be more varied. For example, the phrase "the expense of fresh products render their accessibility to some people" could be restructured for clarity and impact.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider incorporating more complex and compound-complex sentences. Additionally, using different sentence openings (e.g., starting with adverbial phrases or clauses) can add variety. For example, instead of starting with "First," you could begin with "To begin with," or "Initially," which can help to create a more engaging flow.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a good level of grammatical accuracy, but there are some errors that detract from the overall quality. For instance, the phrase "the expense of fresh products render their accessibility to some people" should use "renders" instead of "render" to agree with the singular subject "expense." Additionally, the sentence "the government should have substantial investment in the organic industry" could be improved by changing "have" to "make" for better clarity. Punctuation is mostly correct, but the use of commas could be improved for better readability, particularly in longer sentences.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, focus on subject-verb agreement and ensure that verbs correctly reflect their subjects. Reviewing subject-verb agreement rules can be beneficial. For punctuation, practice breaking down longer sentences into shorter, clearer ones, and use commas to separate clauses effectively. Reading the essay aloud can help identify areas where punctuation may be lacking or where sentences may be too convoluted.

By addressing these areas, the essay can achieve a higher band score in Grammatical Range and Accuracy.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is indeed the case that the high cost of fresh fruits and vegetables is viewed as a significant obstacle for those who wish to adopt a healthy diet. This essay aims to illuminate the driving factors behind this trend before outlining several viable solutions that should be implemented to tackle it.

There are two primary reasons why the expense of fresh produce limits their accessibility for some individuals. First, organic vegetables cultivated in specific conditions often come with exorbitant prices, which means ordinary citizens, particularly those with limited financial resources, face greater challenges in purchasing food due to their modest incomes. Second, these types of produce require rapid transport to maintain their pristine condition until they reach consumers, potentially increasing transportation costs compared to conventionally cultivated products such as rice or grains.

To combat this concerning issue, several essential steps should be considered. If individuals could cultivate fresh produce in local regions, the associated costs would decrease. This is particularly evident in Vietnam, where many provinces opt to grow locally sourced fruits such as strawberries, carrots, and lettuces to minimize delivery costs. This approach encourages more people to embrace healthy eating habits, as they do not have to worry about the origin of what they consume. Furthermore, the government should make a significant investment in the organic sector to produce more organic options at a reasonable cost, thereby facilitating healthy eating for residents.

In conclusion, while there are underlying causes for this pressing issue related to shipping fees and the accessibility of fresh fruits and vegetables, I assert that the aforementioned measures—local cultivation and financial support for organic farming—should be implemented to effectively address this challenge.