fbpx

The digital age has brought an explosion of information, making it difficult to discern truth from falsehood. Why is this happening and what can be done about it?

The digital age has brought an explosion of information, making it difficult to discern truth from falsehood. Why is this happening and what can be done about it?

In this day and age, as a result of digital developments, there is a growing tendency toward information dissemination, which jeopardizes the capability of us to distinguish whether the information is beneficial or problematic. In this essay, I would evaluate some of the reasons leading to this issue before proposing effective solutions to address its implications.
There are compelling reasons why the explosion of information can negatively affect how people differentiate beneficial and problematic content online. First and foremost, to control the validity of information, the government officials accountable for this sector will supervise and select information before disclosing it on the Internet. However, as the explosion of information has become prevalent, due to the variety of methods that people sharing information on numerous platforms, supervision from government authorities may be insufficient. Therefore, people can encounter the inability to distinguish the credibility of the content they receive.
Irrespective of the severity of such a problem, the coalition between the government and all Internet users could effectively prevent the widespread of misleading information. With only an entity to supervise and monitor the legitimacy and accuracy of the information can be not sustainable from a resources management perspective, not only the lack of human resources but also the budget allocation is not sufficient. Hence, allowing users to report problematic information before having a specialized team to check and verify if there are emergences of issues seems to be more efficient.
In conclusion, the challenge in discerning whether a piece of information is factual or has been falsified due to the explosion of information in the digital age is a result of insufficient supervision. In order to handle this issue, the cooperation of authorities and individuals who use the Internet is vital.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "In this day and age" -> "Currently"
    Explanation: "In this day and age" is a colloquial expression. "Currently" is more formal and suitable for academic writing.

  2. "growing tendency toward" -> "increasing trend towards"
    Explanation: "Growing tendency toward" is slightly informal and vague. "Increasing trend towards" is more precise and commonly used in academic contexts.

  3. "jeopardizes the capability of us" -> "compromises our ability"
    Explanation: "Jeopardizes the capability of us" is awkward and informal. "Compromises our ability" is more direct and formal.

  4. "I would evaluate" -> "I will examine"
    Explanation: "I would evaluate" is somewhat tentative and informal. "I will examine" is more assertive and suitable for academic writing.

  5. "compelling reasons" -> "significant reasons"
    Explanation: "Compelling" can imply emotional persuasion, which is less appropriate in academic writing. "Significant" is neutral and more formal.

  6. "the explosion of information" -> "the proliferation of information"
    Explanation: "The explosion of information" is an idiom and can be seen as informal. "The proliferation of information" is a more precise and formal term.

  7. "due to the variety of methods that people sharing" -> "owing to the diverse methods by which individuals share"
    Explanation: "Due to the variety of methods that people sharing" is grammatically incorrect and informal. "Owing to the diverse methods by which individuals share" corrects these issues and enhances formality.

  8. "supervision from government authorities may be insufficient" -> "supervision by government authorities may be inadequate"
    Explanation: "Supervision from" is less formal and slightly incorrect. "Supervision by" is more precise and formal, and "inadequate" is preferred over "insufficient" in this context.

  9. "the coalition between the government and all Internet users" -> "collaboration between government agencies and Internet users"
    Explanation: "The coalition between the government and all Internet users" is vague and informal. "Collaboration between government agencies and Internet users" specifies the entities involved and is more formal.

  10. "With only an entity to supervise and monitor" -> "With only one entity responsible for supervision and monitoring"
    Explanation: "With only an entity to supervise and monitor" is awkward and unclear. "With only one entity responsible for supervision and monitoring" clarifies the role and is more formal.

  11. "can be not sustainable from a resources management perspective" -> "is unsustainable from a resource management perspective"
    Explanation: "Can be not sustainable" is grammatically incorrect and awkward. "Is unsustainable" corrects the grammar and enhances clarity.

  12. "not only the lack of human resources but also the budget allocation is not sufficient" -> "not only the shortage of human resources but also insufficient budget allocation"
    Explanation: "The lack of human resources but also the budget allocation is not sufficient" is awkwardly phrased. "The shortage of human resources but also insufficient budget allocation" corrects the phrasing and maintains formality.

  13. "allowing users to report problematic information" -> "enabling users to report problematic information"
    Explanation: "Allowing" is less formal and slightly vague. "Enabling" is more precise and formal, fitting the academic style better.

  14. "having a specialized team to check and verify if there are emergences of issues" -> "having a specialized team to verify whether issues emerge"
    Explanation: "Having a specialized team to check and verify if there are emergences of issues" is verbose and awkward. "Having a specialized team to verify whether issues emerge" simplifies and clarifies the sentence.

  15. "is a result of insufficient supervision" -> "results from insufficient supervision"
    Explanation: "Is a result of" is slightly informal and less direct. "Results from" is more direct and formal, fitting the academic tone better.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

  • Answer All Parts of the Question:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both parts of the prompt: it identifies reasons for the difficulty in discerning truth from falsehood and proposes solutions. The first body paragraph discusses the insufficiency of government oversight in managing the vast amount of information available online. The second body paragraph suggests a collaborative approach between the government and internet users as a solution. However, the explanation of the reasons could be more nuanced, and the solutions could be elaborated further.
    • How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly outline more reasons contributing to the issue, such as the role of social media algorithms or the rapid spread of misinformation. Additionally, providing more detailed strategies for the proposed solutions, such as specific methods for user reporting or examples of successful initiatives, would strengthen the response.
  • Present a Clear Position Throughout:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position regarding the challenges posed by the explosion of information and the need for collaboration between authorities and users. The thesis statement is clear, and the conclusion reiterates the main points effectively. However, some sentences could be clearer in articulating the position, particularly in the second body paragraph where the phrasing is somewhat convoluted.
    • How to improve: To improve clarity, the writer should aim for more straightforward sentence structures and avoid overly complex phrasing. Using clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph can also help reinforce the main argument and guide the reader through the essay.
  • Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas related to the reasons for misinformation and the proposed solutions. However, the development of these ideas lacks depth. For instance, while the essay mentions government supervision, it does not provide specific examples or statistics to support the claim. Similarly, the proposed solution is somewhat vague and could benefit from further elaboration.
    • How to improve: To enhance the presentation and support of ideas, the writer should include specific examples, data, or case studies that illustrate the points made. This could involve discussing real-world instances of misinformation or successful collaborative efforts between governments and internet users. Additionally, expanding on the implications of the proposed solutions would provide a more comprehensive argument.
  • Stay on Topic:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on the issues of misinformation and the role of government and users. However, there are moments where the language becomes slightly ambiguous, which can distract from the main argument. For example, phrases like "the coalition between the government and all Internet users" could be more clearly defined to ensure the reader understands the intended meaning.
    • How to improve: To maintain focus, the writer should ensure that each sentence directly contributes to the main argument. Avoiding vague language and ensuring that all points made are directly relevant to the prompt will help keep the essay on track. Additionally, reviewing the essay for any off-topic sentences or ideas can help tighten the focus.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the prompt and presents relevant ideas, there is room for improvement in depth, clarity, and specificity. By addressing these areas, the writer can enhance their score in the Task Response criteria.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

  • Organize Information Logically:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, beginning with an introduction that outlines the issue and the approach to be taken. The body paragraphs follow a logical progression, discussing the reasons for the problem and proposing solutions. For instance, the first body paragraph effectively highlights the challenges of information validity due to government oversight limitations. However, the transition between the first and second body paragraphs could be smoother, as the connection between the problem and the proposed solution is somewhat abrupt.
    • How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly link the problem to the solution. For example, after discussing the inadequacies of government supervision, you could introduce the next paragraph with a phrase like, "To address these shortcomings, a collaborative approach involving both the government and internet users is essential."
  • Use Paragraphs:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the topic. The introduction sets the stage, while the body paragraphs delve into the reasons and solutions. However, the second body paragraph could be further divided to improve clarity, as it combines multiple ideas about government resources and user involvement into a single paragraph, which may overwhelm the reader.
    • How to improve: Consider breaking the second body paragraph into two distinct paragraphs: one focusing on the limitations of government resources and the other on the role of users in reporting misinformation. This division would allow for a clearer presentation of ideas and enhance overall readability.
  • Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay employs cohesive devices such as "first and foremost," "however," and "therefore," which aid in guiding the reader through the argument. These devices contribute to the overall coherence of the essay. However, the range of cohesive devices used is somewhat limited, and there are instances where repetition occurs, such as the use of "information" and "government" in close proximity, which can detract from the fluidity of the writing.
    • How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate synonyms or alternative phrases to avoid repetition. For example, instead of repeatedly using "information," consider using terms like "data," "content," or "material." Additionally, introducing more varied transitional phrases, such as "on the other hand" or "consequently," can enhance the essay’s cohesiveness and make the argument more engaging.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion, but with some adjustments in logical flow, paragraph structure, and the variety of cohesive devices, it could achieve an even higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

  • Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with phrases like "explosion of information," "information dissemination," and "distinguish the credibility." However, the vocabulary tends to be somewhat repetitive, particularly with terms like "information" and "government," which appear multiple times without variation. This limits the overall lexical diversity.
    • How to improve: To enhance vocabulary range, consider using synonyms or related terms. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "information," you could incorporate words like "data," "content," or "material." Additionally, varying the phrase structure can help create a more engaging narrative.
  • Use Vocabulary Precisely:

    • Detailed explanation: While some vocabulary is used appropriately, there are instances of imprecise usage. For example, the phrase "the capability of us to distinguish" could be more clearly expressed as "our ability to distinguish." Additionally, "the widespread of misleading information" should be corrected to "the spread of misleading information."
    • How to improve: Focus on clarity and conciseness in word choice. Reviewing phrases for grammatical accuracy and ensuring that they convey the intended meaning without ambiguity will enhance precision. Practicing paraphrasing can also help in developing a more precise vocabulary.
  • Use Correct Spelling:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits correct spelling, with no glaring errors. However, the phrase "the widespread of misleading information" contains a grammatical error that may confuse readers, as "widespread" should not be used as a noun in this context.
    • How to improve: To improve spelling and grammatical accuracy, consider proofreading your work or using tools like spell checkers. Additionally, reading essays aloud can help catch errors that might be overlooked during silent reading. Engaging in regular writing practice will also reinforce correct spelling and grammar usage.

In summary, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and employs a reasonable range of vocabulary, improvements in lexical variety, precision, and grammatical accuracy are necessary to achieve a higher band score. Engaging in targeted vocabulary exercises, practicing paraphrasing, and proofreading can significantly enhance your lexical resource in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

  • Use a Wide Range of Structures:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including complex sentences and conditional clauses. For instance, phrases like "as a result of digital developments" and "Irrespective of the severity of such a problem" showcase the use of introductory clauses and transitional phrases effectively. However, there are instances of repetitive structures, particularly in the use of "there is" and "there are," which can make the writing feel somewhat monotonous.
    • How to improve: To enhance the range of structures, consider incorporating more varied sentence openings and using different grammatical forms. For example, instead of starting sentences with "There is" or "There are," you might rephrase to begin with the subject or use participial phrases, such as "The growing tendency toward information dissemination jeopardizes our ability to distinguish…" This will add dynamism to your writing.
  • Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

    • Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a good level of grammatical accuracy, with only a few minor errors. For example, the phrase "the coalition between the government and all Internet users could effectively prevent the widespread of misleading information" contains a slight grammatical error; it should be "the spread of misleading information." Additionally, punctuation is mostly correct, but there are instances where commas could enhance clarity, such as after introductory phrases.
    • How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to common collocations and phrases. For example, ensure that you use "the spread" instead of "the widespread." Furthermore, practice using commas to separate clauses and enhance readability. For instance, revising "However, as the explosion of information has become prevalent, due to the variety of methods that people sharing information on numerous platforms, supervision from government authorities may be insufficient" to "However, as the explosion of information has become prevalent due to the variety of methods people use to share information on numerous platforms, supervision from government authorities may be insufficient" would clarify the sentence structure and improve flow.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid command of grammatical range and accuracy, focusing on diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical precision will help elevate the writing to a higher band score.

Bài sửa mẫu

In this day and age, owing to digital developments, there is an increasing trend towards information dissemination, which compromises our ability to distinguish whether the information is beneficial or problematic. In this essay, I will examine some of the significant reasons leading to this issue before proposing effective solutions to address its implications.

There are compelling reasons why the proliferation of information can negatively affect how people differentiate between beneficial and problematic content online. First and foremost, to control the validity of information, government officials accountable for this sector are expected to supervise and select content before disclosing it on the Internet. However, as the explosion of information has become prevalent, owing to the diverse methods by which individuals share information across numerous platforms, supervision by government authorities may be inadequate. Consequently, people often struggle to assess the credibility of the content they encounter.

Regardless of the severity of this problem, collaboration between the government and all Internet users could effectively prevent the spread of misleading information. With only one entity responsible for supervision and monitoring, this approach is unsustainable from a resource management perspective, given not only the shortage of human resources but also insufficient budget allocation. Therefore, enabling users to report problematic information before having a specialized team verify whether issues emerge seems to be a more efficient strategy.

In conclusion, the challenge of discerning whether a piece of information is factual or falsified, owing to the explosion of information in the digital age, results from insufficient supervision. To address this issue, the cooperation of authorities and individuals who use the Internet is vital.

Bài viết liên quan

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Around the world, many adults are working from home, and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more…

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này