fbpx

The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room.

The maps show two different plans designed for a conference room.

The map illustrates two difference design directions for a conference room.
Overall, two plans are not have a lot of difference about facilities equipped but in term of layout, each plan has a difference way.
The first similarity of the two plans is the entrance that is located on the top-right hand corner of the rooms. Although have the difference about the number of chairs in the room, specifically plan B have more chairs than ones and chairs in this plan are distributed on both sides of the table, two plan remain stable with only three tables arranged in a U-shape.
Also, in the plan A, the morning tea is located at the bottom of map while in plan B this are distributed in the left side of the entrance when we entered. In addition, in plan A, there is a podium on the top left corner of the map but it is removed in plan B.


Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

  1. "two difference design directions" -> "two different design directions"
    Explanation: "Difference" is a noun, while "different" is the correct adjective to describe the design directions.

  2. "two plans are not have a lot of difference about facilities equipped" -> "the two plans do not exhibit significant differences in the facilities provided"
    Explanation: The phrase "are not have" is grammatically incorrect. "Do not exhibit significant differences" is more formal and precise, and "facilities provided" is clearer than "facilities equipped."

  3. "in term of layout, each plan has a difference way" -> "in terms of layout, each plan has a distinct approach"
    Explanation: "In term" should be "in terms" for grammatical accuracy. "A difference way" is vague; "a distinct approach" is more precise and formal.

  4. "the first similarity of the two plans is the entrance that is located on the top-right hand corner of the rooms" -> "a notable similarity between the two plans is that the entrance is located in the top-right corner of the rooms"
    Explanation: "The first similarity" is awkward; "a notable similarity" flows better. "That is located on" is simplified to "is located in," which is more concise.

  5. "Although have the difference about the number of chairs in the room" -> "Although there is a difference in the number of chairs in the room"
    Explanation: The phrase is missing the subject "there." "Difference in" is the correct prepositional phrase to use here.

  6. "specifically plan B have more chairs than ones" -> "specifically, Plan B has more chairs than Plan A"
    Explanation: "Have" should be "has" for subject-verb agreement. Adding "Plan A" clarifies the comparison.

  7. "and chairs in this plan are distributed on both sides of the table" -> "and the chairs in this plan are arranged on both sides of the table"
    Explanation: "Arranged" is a more precise verb than "distributed," which suggests a different meaning.

  8. "two plan remain stable with only three tables arranged in a U-shape" -> "both plans remain consistent with only three tables arranged in a U-shape"
    Explanation: "Two plan" should be "both plans" for grammatical correctness. "Remain stable" is less clear than "remain consistent."

  9. "the morning tea is located at the bottom of map" -> "the morning tea area is located at the bottom of the map"
    Explanation: "The morning tea" should specify "area" for clarity, and "the bottom of map" requires the article "the."

  10. "while in plan B this are distributed in the left side of the entrance when we entered" -> "whereas in Plan B, it is located on the left side of the entrance"
    Explanation: "This are" is incorrect; it should be "it is." "Whereas" provides a clearer contrast, and "on the left side" is more precise than "in the left side."

  11. "In addition, in plan A, there is a podium on the top left corner of the map but it is removed in plan B" -> "Additionally, Plan A features a podium in the top-left corner of the map, whereas it is absent in Plan B"
    Explanation: "In addition" is less formal than "additionally." "Features" is a more precise verb than "there is," and "whereas it is absent" provides clarity in contrast.

Band điểm Task Achivement ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5

Explanation: The essay attempts to address the task by comparing the two plans. However, the essay does not provide a clear overview of the main features of the plans. The essay focuses on details, such as the number of chairs and the location of the morning tea, rather than on the overall layout and design of the plans. The essay also includes some irrelevant information, such as the statement that "two plan remain stable with only three tables arranged in a U-shape." This statement is not relevant to the task, as the essay should focus on comparing the two plans.

How to improve: The essay could be improved by providing a clearer overview of the main features of the plans. The essay should also focus on comparing the plans in a more systematic way. For example, the essay could compare the layout of the plans, the location of the key features, and the overall design of the plans. The essay should also avoid including irrelevant information.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay presents information with some organization, but there is a noticeable lack of overall progression. While it attempts to compare the two plans, the connections between ideas are not always clear, leading to confusion. The use of cohesive devices is inadequate, with some inaccuracies and repetitive phrases. The paragraphing is present but not always logical, as the ideas do not flow smoothly from one to another.

How to improve: To enhance coherence and cohesion, the writer should focus on clearly structuring the essay with logical progression of ideas. Using a wider range of cohesive devices appropriately will help connect sentences and paragraphs more effectively. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph presents a single clear topic will improve clarity. It is also important to proofread for grammatical accuracy and to avoid awkward phrasing, which can detract from the overall coherence of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of vocabulary that is minimally adequate for the task. While it attempts to describe the differences and similarities between the two conference room designs, the vocabulary used is basic and repetitive. There are noticeable errors in word choice, such as "difference design directions" instead of "different design options," and "this are distributed" instead of "these are distributed." Additionally, there are issues with spelling and grammatical structure that may cause some difficulty for the reader, such as "two plans are not have a lot of difference" and "the first similarity of the two plans." These errors detract from the overall clarity and coherence of the essay.

How to improve: To enhance the lexical resource score, the writer should aim to use a wider range of vocabulary, including less common lexical items, and ensure correct word forms and collocations. Practicing synonyms and varying sentence structures can help avoid repetition. Additionally, focusing on grammatical accuracy and clarity in expression will improve the overall quality of the writing. Engaging with more complex vocabulary and sentence forms will also contribute to a higher band score.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 5

Band Score: 5.0

Explanation: The essay demonstrates a limited range of grammatical structures and contains several errors that affect clarity. While there are attempts to use complex sentences, they often lack accuracy and lead to confusion. For instance, phrases like "two difference design directions" and "in term of layout, each plan has a difference way" contain grammatical inaccuracies that hinder understanding. Additionally, there are issues with subject-verb agreement, such as "this are distributed" instead of "these are distributed." Overall, while the essay conveys some ideas, the frequent grammatical errors and limited range of structures result in a score of 5.

How to improve: To improve the score, the writer should focus on enhancing grammatical accuracy by reviewing subject-verb agreement and ensuring that sentences are structured correctly. Expanding the range of sentence structures used, including more complex and varied forms, would also contribute to a higher score. Additionally, proofreading for common errors and clarity can help reduce mistakes and improve overall communication.

Bài sửa mẫu

The map illustrates two different design plans for a conference room. Overall, the two plans do not differ significantly in terms of the facilities provided; however, each plan has a distinct layout.

The first similarity between the two plans is the entrance, which is located in the top-right corner of the room. Although there is a difference in the number of chairs, specifically, plan B has more chairs than plan A, and the chairs in plan B are distributed on both sides of the table. Both plans maintain a consistent arrangement with only three tables set up in a U-shape.

Additionally, in plan A, the morning tea area is situated at the bottom of the map, while in plan B, it is located on the left side of the entrance. Furthermore, plan A features a podium in the top left corner of the map, which is absent in plan B.

Bài viết liên quan

Phản hồi

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *

IELTS Writify

Chấm IELTS Writing Free x GPT

Lưu ý

Sắp bảo trì server

Để đảm bảo tính ổn định của web, web sẽ thực hiện backup dữ liệu hàng ngày từ 3h-3h30 sáng

Rất mong quý thầy cô và học viên thông cảm vì bất tiện này