Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?

It is thought that be in contact by speaking is more influential than writing. While this could be true to a certain extent, I believe communicate by writing are more likely to have a strong repercussion on relationships.
Clearly, there are several reasons why contact by writing is more powerful. From a social perspective, using letters seems to be formal. For instance, when having an appointment or an interview, sending email to superior or partners is a crucial role that represent you have a professional working style, it is also shown that you are immediately well-prepared for upcoming plans. From an educational perspective, almost academic materials are copiled on paper. This allows students and intellectual people to store information for future references. The most important reason why spoken communication is not as persuasive as written is legal. Every word will become valuable if it is authenticated by legal documents.
On the other side, communicating by talking also has benefits but can not be as powerful as word-by-word connection. First of all, individuals have adopted spoken word as a way to express emotions through what they are saying. By listening to what they have talked, we can effortlessly know their feelings by means of that talk. Therefore, the conversation will become more convincing. Secondly, when talking face-to-face, a person can develop a sense of flexibility, discussing whatever topic they want during any period of time.
To summarize, there are many reasons that written communication outweighs spoken communication. Conspicuously, legal value is only applied for printed materials, not orally.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"be in contact by speaking" -> "communicating verbally"
Explanation: "Be in contact by speaking" is awkward and lacks precision. "Communicating verbally" is a more formal and clear phrase that conveys the intended meaning effectively.
"communicate by writing are" -> "written communication is"
Explanation: "Communicate by writing are" lacks proper subject-verb agreement and clarity. "Written communication is" provides a grammatically correct and concise expression of the idea.
"strong repercussion" -> "significant impact"
Explanation: "Strong repercussion" sounds overly dramatic and informal. "Significant impact" maintains formality and clarity while conveying the intended meaning.
"copiled on paper" -> "compiled in written form"
Explanation: "Copiled on paper" is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. "Compiled in written form" is a more precise and formal expression.
"have adopted spoken word" -> "utilize spoken language"
Explanation: "Have adopted spoken word" is informal and awkward. "Utilize spoken language" is more formal and clear in the context of discussing communication methods.
"effortlessly know their feelings by means of that talk" -> "readily discern their emotions from their speech"
Explanation: "Effortlessly know their feelings by means of that talk" is wordy and unclear. "Readily discern their emotions from their speech" is more concise and formal.
"conspicuously" -> "notably"
Explanation: "Conspicuously" is less common in academic writing and sounds somewhat informal. "Notably" is a more suitable alternative that maintains formality and clarity.
"legal value is only applied for printed materials" -> "legal validity is conferred primarily on written documents"
Explanation: "Legal value is only applied for printed materials" is unclear and lacks precision. "Legal validity is conferred primarily on written documents" clarifies the point and uses more formal language.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Task Response: 6

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts ofBand Score for Task Response: 6

Band Score for Task Response: 6

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken andBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts ofBand Score for Task Response**: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential powerBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the QuestionBand Score for Task Response**: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power ofBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
Band Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication butBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts toBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately arguesBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to addressBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues thatBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the questionBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication isBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question byBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- **Band Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing bothBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providingBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both theBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing aBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages ofBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a moreBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communicationBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses ofBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spokenBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken andBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. ItBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. AdditionallyBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communicationBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally,Band Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimatelyBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, itBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improveBand Score for Task Response**: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delveBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve:Band Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper intoBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve: To improveBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper into theBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve: To improve,Band Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper into the extentBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve: To improve, ensureBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper into the extent toBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve: To improve, ensure aBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper into the extent to which theBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both the advantages of written communication and the benefits of spoken communication. It acknowledges that spoken communication may have some advantages but ultimately asserts that written communication is more powerful.
- How to improve: To improve, ensure a moreBand Score for Task Response: 6
Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay attempts to address all parts of the question by discussing both spoken and written communication and expressing a clear opinion, albeit with some limitations. It acknowledges the potential power of spoken communication but ultimately argues that written communication is more influential.
- How to improve: The essay could improve by providing a more balanced discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication. Additionally, it could delve deeper into the extent to which the writer agrees or disagrees with the prompt, offering more nuanced reasoning.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear position throughout by consistently arguing that written communication is more powerful than spoken communication. It maintains this stance from the introduction through to the conclusion.
- How to improve: To further strengthen clarity, the essay could explicitly state the writer’s position in the introduction and reiterate it in the conclusion, ensuring the reader is left with a clear understanding of the writer’s viewpoint.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas but lacks thorough development and support. It briefly mentions reasons supporting the power of written communication, such as formality, educational materials, and legal value. However, these points are not sufficiently elaborated upon or supported with evidence or examples. Similarly, the benefits of spoken communication are mentioned, such as emotional expression and flexibility, but these are also lacking in depth.
- How to improve: To improve, the essay should provide more detailed explanations and examples to support each point made. This could involve expanding upon the social, educational, and legal aspects of written communication, as well as providing specific instances where spoken communication excels.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay mostly stays on topic by discussing the relative power of spoken and written communication as compared to each other. However, there are moments where the essay veers slightly off-topic, such as when discussing emotional expression in spoken communication without directly tying it back to the prompt.
- How to improve: To maintain focus, the essay should ensure that every point made directly relates to the comparison between spoken and written communication. Avoiding tangents will strengthen the overall coherence and relevance of the essay.

Overall, while the essay presents a clear position and attempts to address the prompt, it could benefit from more thorough development of ideas and better organization to strengthen its coherence and persuasiveness. Additionally, providing more balanced arguments and supporting evidence would enhance the depth of analysis.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally presents a coherent argument, but there are some instances where the logical organization could be improved. For example, the introduction sets up the argument effectively by stating the writer’s opinion, but the subsequent paragraphs could follow a clearer progression of ideas. The transition between discussing the benefits of written communication to the benefits of spoken communication is somewhat abrupt, lacking a smooth transition.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider structuring the essay more clearly. Start each body paragraph with a topic sentence that directly relates to the main argument. Additionally, use transitional phrases to smoothly guide the reader from one point to the next. For instance, phrases like "Furthermore" or "In contrast" can help signal shifts in focus.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas. Each paragraph addresses a distinct aspect of the argument, such as the social perspective, educational perspective, and benefits of spoken communication. However, some paragraphs could be further developed to fully explore the ideas presented.
- How to improve: Ensure that each paragraph is sufficiently developed to support the main argument. Provide specific examples or evidence to strengthen the points made in each paragraph. Additionally, consider the balance between paragraphs to maintain coherence and cohesion throughout the essay.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes a variety of cohesive devices to connect ideas and improve coherence. For instance, transition words like "Firstly," "Secondly," and "To summarize" help organize the argument and guide the reader through the essay. However, there is room for improvement in the diversity and sophistication of cohesive devices used.
- How to improve: Expand the range of cohesive devices used to create smoother transitions between ideas. Incorporate a mix of transitional phrases, pronouns, and conjunctions to add complexity and coherence to the essay. Additionally, pay attention to parallel structure and consistency in the use of cohesive devices throughout the essay for a more polished presentation.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of vocabulary, including some formal and informal language. There is an attempt to use varied vocabulary to convey ideas, such as "influential," "repercussion," "persuasive," and "authenticated." However, the range could be expanded further to include more sophisticated and nuanced vocabulary to enhance precision and depth of expression. For instance, instead of using "influential," incorporating synonyms like "potent" or "impactful" could enrich the essay’s vocabulary.
- How to improve: To enhance the range of vocabulary, it’s beneficial to read extensively and actively seek out new words. Additionally, employing a thesaurus or vocabulary-building exercises can aid in discovering synonyms and antonyms to express ideas more precisely and diversely. Furthermore, focusing on learning vocabulary within specific thematic areas relevant to the essay topics can also broaden lexical resources.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays an attempt to use vocabulary with varying degrees of precision. However, there are instances where word choice could be more precise to convey intended meanings. For example, the phrase "By listening to what they have talked, we can effortlessly know their feelings by means of that talk" could be refined for clarity and precision. Instead, employing a term like "articulated" or "expressed" might enhance the precision of the expression.
- How to improve: To improve precision in vocabulary usage, it’s advisable to carefully consider the context and intended meaning of each word. Engaging in exercises that involve substituting words with synonyms and evaluating their suitability can help in selecting the most precise term. Additionally, revising and editing drafts with a focus on refining vocabulary can contribute to clearer and more precise expression.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a mixed level of spelling accuracy. While many words are spelled correctly, there are notable instances of misspelled words and typographical errors throughout the text. For instance, "be in contact" should be "being in contact," "copiled" should be "compiled," and "conspicuously" is misspelled as "conspicously." These errors, though not pervasive, can detract from the overall clarity and professionalism of the essay.
- How to improve: Improving spelling accuracy requires regular practice and attention to detail. Utilizing tools such as spell-checkers and dictionaries can help identify and correct spelling errors. Additionally, proofreading essays carefully before submission and seeking feedback from peers or educators can aid in identifying and addressing spelling mistakes effectively. Consistent practice in spelling and vocabulary usage is crucial for enhancing overall written communication skills.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 6

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a fair range of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. However, there is room for improvement in terms of variety. The essay predominantly consists of simple and compound sentences, with fewer instances of complex structures. For example, "From a social perspective, using letters seems to be formal" is a complex sentence that adds depth to the argument. However, the essay lacks consistent use of complex structures throughout.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider incorporating more complex sentences throughout the essay. This can be achieved by using subordinate clauses, relative clauses, and other complex grammatical constructions. For instance, instead of relying solely on simple sentences like "It is thought that be in contact by speaking is more influential than writing," try integrating more complex structures like "While it is commonly believed that spoken communication holds greater sway than written forms, the nuances and permanence of the written word often wield a more profound impact."
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable level of grammatical accuracy, but there are noticeable errors throughout the text. For instance, "It is thought that be in contact by speaking is more influential than writing" contains a subject-verb agreement error ("be" should be "being" or "being in contact"). Additionally, there are punctuation errors, such as missing commas in compound sentences (e.g., "When having an appointment or an interview, sending email to superior or partners is a crucial role that represent you have a professional working style").
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, it is essential to review and practice key grammar rules, particularly those related to subject-verb agreement and punctuation. Utilize resources such as grammar guides or language learning apps to reinforce your understanding of these concepts. Additionally, proofreading your essays carefully before submission can help identify and correct errors. For instance, in the sentence mentioned above, it should be "When having an appointment or an interview, sending an email to superiors or partners plays a crucial role in representing your professional working style."

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a competent level of grammatical range and accuracy, there is still room for improvement in terms of sentence structure variety and grammatical precision. By actively incorporating a wider range of sentence structures and refining grammatical skills through practice and review, the essay could achieve a higher band score in the Grammatical Range and Accuracy criterion.

Bài sửa mẫu

It is commonly believed that verbal communication holds more sway than written communication. While this may hold some truth, I contend that written communication tends to exert a stronger influence on relationships.

Undoubtedly, there are several compelling reasons why written communication carries greater weight. From a social standpoint, the use of written correspondence, such as emails or letters, often conveys formality. For example, in professional settings like appointments or interviews, sending an email to superiors or colleagues underscores a professional demeanor and preparedness for upcoming engagements. Moreover, in the realm of education, a vast majority of academic materials are documented on paper, enabling students and scholars to archive information for future reference. Arguably, the most compelling aspect of the potency of written communication lies in its legal validity. Legal significance is predominantly attributed to written documentation, conferring weight and authority to every word authenticated within such documents.

On the flip side, verbal communication holds its own merits but lacks the precision and permanence of written discourse. Firstly, individuals often utilize spoken language as a conduit for expressing emotions. By actively listening to their speech, one can readily discern their emotions, rendering the conversation more impactful and convincing. Additionally, face-to-face interactions afford individuals a level of flexibility, allowing for spontaneous discussions on diverse topics at any given moment.

In conclusion, while verbal communication possesses certain advantages, it is outweighed by the persuasive prowess of written communication. Notably, the legal validity conferred upon written documents underscores their enduring influence and significance, a factor absent in oral exchanges.