viết hội thoại cuộc kể về 1 cuôc tranh cãi

Ngọc: Hey, Vy, you look really stressed out lately. Is everything okay?

Vy: Ugh, I’m so frustrated. This whole situation is driving me up the wall!

Ngọc: Oh no, what happened?

Vy: It’s about my project group. Susan keeps making decisions without asking me or anyone else. We had a huge argument, and now she won’t even talk to me.

Ngọc: That sounds rough. Do you know what started it?

Vy: Well, Susan decided to change our entire project topic without consulting anyone. We had all spent hours researching the original topic, and now everything feels like a mess. When I tried talking to her about it, she accused me of being controlling.

Ngọc: That’s really annoying. Have you tried sitting down with her and the group to work things out?

Vy: I want to, but she keeps ignoring me, and I don’t know what to do. I feel like I’m pushing too hard, but I just want everyone to have a say in this project.

Ngọc: I get it. Maybe tomorrow, you could call for a group meeting, and I can help you prepare so things don’t get too tense. You could explain that everyone’s input is important for the project to go smoothly.

Vy: You’d really do that? That sounds like a great plan. Thank you so much, Ngọc.

Ngọc: Anytime! I’m sure they’ll understand once you explain it clearly.

Vy: Thanks again! You’re an amazing friend.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Ngọc: Hey, Vy, you look really stressed out lately." -> "Ngọc: Hi, Vy, you appear to be quite stressed lately."
Explanation: Replacing "Hey" with "Hi" and "really stressed out" with "quite stressed" refines the tone to be more formal and appropriate for an academic context. "Appear to be" is a more precise and formal way to describe someone’s appearance.
"Ugh, I’m so frustrated." -> "I am extremely frustrated."
Explanation: Removing "Ugh" eliminates an informal expression, and replacing "so" with "extremely" enhances the formality of the statement.
"This whole situation is driving me up the wall!" -> "This entire situation is extremely frustrating."
Explanation: Replacing "driving me up the wall" with "extremely frustrating" removes an idiomatic expression and maintains a formal tone.
"Oh no, what happened?" -> "Oh dear, what occurred."
Explanation: "Oh dear" is a more formal expression than "Oh no," and "occurred" is more precise than "happened" in formal writing.
"It’s about my project group." -> "It concerns my project group."
Explanation: "Concerns" is a more formal synonym for "about," aligning better with academic language.
"Susan keeps making decisions without asking me or anyone else." -> "Susan consistently makes decisions without consulting me or any other group members."
Explanation: "Consistently" and "consulting" are more precise and formal than "keeps" and "asking," respectively.
"We had a huge argument" -> "We experienced a significant disagreement"
Explanation: "Experienced a significant disagreement" is more formal and less colloquial than "had a huge argument."
"won’t even talk to me" -> "refuses to communicate with me"
Explanation: "Refuses to communicate with me" is more formal and precise than "won’t even talk to me."
"That sounds rough." -> "That appears challenging."
Explanation: "Appears challenging" is more formal and less colloquial than "sounds rough."
"Do you know what started it?" -> "Do you know the origin of this issue?"
Explanation: "The origin of this issue" is a more formal and precise way to ask about the cause of a problem.
"She accused me of being controlling." -> "She accused me of being overly controlling."
Explanation: Adding "overly" specifies the nature of the control, enhancing the formality and precision of the statement.
"I want to, but she keeps ignoring me" -> "I wish to, but she continues to ignore me"
Explanation: "Wish to" and "continues to ignore" are more formal alternatives to "want to" and "keeps ignoring," respectively.
"I feel like I’m pushing too hard" -> "I perceive myself as exerting undue pressure"
Explanation: "Perceive myself as exerting undue pressure" is a more formal and precise way to express the feeling of pushing too hard.
"You could explain that everyone’s input is important" -> "You could emphasize the importance of everyone’s input"
Explanation: "Emphasize the importance of" is a more formal and academically appropriate phrase than "explain that everyone’s input is important."
"You’re an amazing friend." -> "You are an excellent friend."
Explanation: "You are an excellent friend" is more formal and appropriate for an academic context than "You’re an amazing friend."

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses the prompt by presenting a dialogue that revolves around a conflict between Vy and her project group member, Susan. The conversation captures the essence of a dispute, detailing the frustrations and misunderstandings that arise from Susan’s unilateral decision-making. The dialogue format allows for a clear depiction of the conflict, fulfilling the requirement of narrating a debate or argument. However, the essay could have included more context about the project itself or the stakes involved to enhance the depth of the conflict.
- How to improve: To comprehensively address all elements of the question, the writer could introduce a brief background about the project and the roles of each group member. This would provide readers with a clearer understanding of the implications of the argument and the importance of collaboration.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The dialogue maintains a clear position regarding Vy’s frustrations and the perceived unfairness of Susan’s actions. Vy’s feelings of being sidelined are articulated well, and Ngọc’s supportive responses reinforce the position of advocating for teamwork and communication. The clarity of Vy’s stance is consistent throughout the dialogue, making it easy for the reader to follow the emotional trajectory of the conversation.
- How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, the writer could have included more explicit statements from Vy about her expectations for group collaboration. Additionally, reinforcing the consequences of the argument on the group’s dynamics could provide a more compelling narrative.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents the main idea of the conflict effectively, with Vy expressing her frustrations and Ngọc offering support. The dialogue format allows for a natural extension of ideas, as the conversation flows logically from one point to the next. However, while the ideas are presented, they could benefit from deeper exploration. For instance, the emotional impact on Vy and the potential outcomes of the argument are touched upon but not fully developed.
- How to improve: To enhance the presentation and support of ideas, the writer could incorporate more emotional depth by describing Vy’s feelings in greater detail or exploring the potential repercussions of the conflict on the group’s success. Including specific examples of how the conflict has affected the group’s progress could also strengthen the narrative.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic of a debate, with all dialogue centered around Vy’s conflict with Susan. There are no significant deviations from the main theme, which helps maintain clarity and coherence throughout the conversation. The dialogue effectively illustrates the tension and resolution attempts, keeping the reader engaged with the central issue.
- How to improve: While the essay stays on topic, the writer could enhance the narrative by briefly mentioning how the conflict affects other group members or the overall project. This would provide a broader context and reinforce the importance of addressing the argument, ensuring that the focus remains relevant while enriching the discussion.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task requirements, effectively presenting a dialogue about a conflict. To achieve an even higher band score, the writer should consider adding more context, emotional depth, and broader implications of the argument while maintaining the clarity and focus already established.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 8

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a dialogue that flows logically from one speaker to another, effectively capturing the progression of the conversation. Each exchange builds on the previous one, allowing the reader to follow the narrative of the conflict between Vy and Susan. For instance, Vy’s frustration is clearly articulated, and Ngọc’s responses provide supportive feedback that guides the conversation towards a resolution. The logical sequence of events—from the introduction of the problem to the proposed solution—demonstrates a strong organizational structure.
- How to improve: To enhance the logical flow, consider adding transitional phrases or sentences that summarize key points before moving to the next topic. For example, after Vy explains the issue with Susan, a brief recap of the consequences of that decision could help reinforce the significance of the conflict before Ngọc offers a solution.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The dialogue is presented in a conversational format, which is appropriate for the context. However, it lacks clear paragraph breaks that could enhance readability and emphasize shifts in topics or emotions. Each speaker’s turn is separated, but grouping related exchanges into paragraphs could provide a more structured appearance. For instance, the initial exchange about Vy’s stress could be one paragraph, while the discussion about the project could form another.
- How to improve: Implementing paragraph breaks where there are shifts in focus or emotional tone would improve clarity. For example, after Vy expresses her frustration, a new paragraph could begin when Ngọc offers advice, indicating a shift from problem description to problem-solving.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs cohesive devices effectively, such as "Well," "That sounds rough," and "I get it," which help to maintain the flow of conversation and connect ideas. These phrases create a natural rhythm in the dialogue and enhance the coherence of the exchanges. However, the range of cohesive devices used is somewhat limited, primarily relying on conversational fillers and basic conjunctions.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, consider incorporating more varied linking words and phrases that can connect ideas across different parts of the dialogue. For example, using phrases like "In addition," "Furthermore," or "On the other hand" could help to articulate contrasting viewpoints or further develop the discussion. Additionally, using pronouns and synonyms to refer back to previously mentioned subjects can enhance cohesion throughout the dialogue.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of coherence and cohesion, with clear logical organization and effective use of dialogue. By implementing the suggested improvements, the writer can further elevate the quality of the essay.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary appropriate for a conversation about a conflict. Phrases like "driving me up the wall," "huge argument," and "pushing too hard" show an attempt to use idiomatic expressions and varied language. However, the overall vocabulary is somewhat limited, with several instances of repetition (e.g., "project" and "group").
- How to improve: To enhance lexical variety, consider incorporating synonyms or related terms. For example, instead of repeatedly using "project," you could use "assignment," "task," or "collaboration." Additionally, try to include more descriptive adjectives or adverbs to enrich the dialogue, such as "overwhelming" instead of just "mess."
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The vocabulary used is generally appropriate for the context, but there are moments where precision could be improved. For instance, the term "controlling" used by Vy could be seen as slightly vague; it would be more effective to specify what actions made her feel that way, such as "overbearing" or "domineering."
- How to improve: Focus on selecting words that convey your intended meaning more accurately. Instead of using general terms, think about the specific emotions or actions you want to describe. For example, instead of saying "making decisions without asking," you could say "unilaterally deciding," which conveys a stronger sense of disregard for collaboration.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay is free from spelling errors, which indicates a good level of accuracy in this area. Words are spelled correctly, and there are no typographical mistakes that detract from the overall readability of the dialogue.
- How to improve: To maintain and further improve spelling accuracy, continue to practice writing regularly and consider using tools like spell checkers or grammar checkers. Additionally, reading more extensively can help reinforce correct spelling through exposure to well-written texts.

In summary, to achieve a higher band score for Lexical Resource, the essay could benefit from a wider range of vocabulary, more precise word choices, and continued attention to spelling accuracy. Engaging in exercises that focus on synonyms, idiomatic expressions, and descriptive language will also be beneficial.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures. For instance, the use of direct speech effectively conveys the dialogue between the characters, which adds dynamism to the narrative. Sentences like "Susan decided to change our entire project topic without consulting anyone" showcase a complex structure with a subordinate clause, while simpler sentences such as "I want to, but she keeps ignoring me" illustrate the use of conjunctions to connect thoughts. However, the range could be further enhanced by incorporating more complex grammatical forms, such as conditional sentences or passive voice constructions, which would add depth to the dialogue.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider introducing more complex sentences that include conditional clauses (e.g., "If Susan had consulted us, we wouldn’t be in this situation") or varying the use of direct and indirect speech. This could enhance the narrative flow and provide a richer context for the characters’ emotions and actions.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The grammatical accuracy in the essay is generally strong, with few errors present. For example, the use of punctuation in dialogue is mostly correct, as seen in the way the characters’ speech is punctuated with commas and exclamation marks. However, there are minor issues, such as the lack of commas in longer sentences that could improve clarity. For instance, in the sentence "I feel like I’m pushing too hard, but I just want everyone to have a say in this project," the comma usage is correct, but a slight restructuring could enhance readability.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, focus on ensuring that all sentence components are clearly separated, especially in longer sentences. Additionally, reviewing rules for punctuation in dialogue can help avoid any potential confusion. Practicing with complex sentences and ensuring that clauses are correctly punctuated will also aid in achieving greater clarity and precision in writing.

Overall, the essay displays a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By incorporating more complex structures and refining punctuation, the writer can further elevate their writing quality.

Bài sửa mẫu

**Ngọc:** Hey, Vy, you seem to be quite stressed lately. Is everything alright?

**Vy:** Ugh, I am extremely frustrated. This entire situation is driving me up the wall!

**Ngọc:** Oh dear, what occurred?

**Vy:** It concerns my project group. Susan consistently makes decisions without consulting me or any other group members. We experienced a significant disagreement, and now she refuses to communicate with me.

**Ngọc:** That appears challenging. Do you know the origin of this issue?

**Vy:** Well, Susan decided to change our entire project topic without discussing it with anyone. We had all spent hours researching the original topic, and now everything feels like a mess. When I tried talking to her about it, she accused me of being overly controlling.

**Ngọc:** That’s really annoying. Have you tried sitting down with her and the group to work things out?

**Vy:** I wish to, but she continues to ignore me, and I don’t know what to do. I perceive myself as exerting undue pressure, but I just want everyone to have a say in this project.

**Ngọc:** I understand. Maybe tomorrow, you could call for a group meeting, and I can help you prepare so things don’t get too tense. You could emphasize the importance of everyone’s input for the project to go smoothly.

**Vy:** You’d really do that? That sounds like a great plan. Thank you so much, Ngọc.

**Ngọc:** Anytime! I’m sure they’ll understand once you explain it clearly.

**Vy:** Thanks again! You are an excellent friend.