Nowadays, many people believe that the printed newspaper or magazine will be still existed in the future. However, others think it is a thing in the past and it will be forgotten by readers. Write an essay to discuss this problem and give your opinion.

Nowadays, many people believe that the printed newspaper or magazine will be still existed in the future. However, others think it is a thing in the past and it will be forgotten by readers.
Write an essay to discuss this problem and give your opinion.

People have divergent views with regard to the question of whether printed newspapers or magazines will still exist in the future. While a school of thought holds that these traditional forms of media will persist into the future, others claim that they are relics of the past destined to be forgotten. From my standpoint, I side with the former idea.
Admittedly, it is seemingly comprehensible why advocates subscribe to the view that printed media will eventually be forgotten as the world moves towards digital consumption. Chief of these is the unparalleled accessibility and immediacy offered by digital platforms. With a simple click or tap, and the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and online news apps, readers can instantly access information from anywhere, contributing significantly to the decline of traditional print media. Furthermore, the affordability and accessibility of digital media, with its free or low-cost subscription models, significantly reduce the appeal of traditional print media. This shift not only democratizes information but also underscores the growing obsolescence of print in an increasingly digital world.
Despite the aforementioned line of reasoning, it is believed that printed newspapers or magazines in the traditional format will persist into the future. The primary reason is that printed newspapers are often seen as more credible than digital sources. This trust is especially pronounced in regions with limited technological infrastructure or among populations less comfortable with digital platforms, ensuring that there remains a demand for these publications. Additionally traditional newspapers are distinguished by their rigorous editorial processes, which involve comprehensive fact-checking and expert review by qualified teams. This meticulous scrutiny ensures that the information presented is accurate and reliable, providing readers with trustworthy sources and maintaining high standards of journalistic integrity
In conclusion, while some sufficient justifications support that traditional newspapers or magazines are becoming relics of the past and will fade from the memory of readers, it is my firm conviction that it will continue to exist in the future.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"People have divergent views with regard to the question of whether" -> "There are differing opinions regarding the question of whether"
Explanation: The phrase "There are differing opinions regarding" is more formal and concise, enhancing the academic tone of the introduction.
"a school of thought holds that" -> "a perspective maintains that"
Explanation: "A perspective maintains that" is more precise and academically appropriate than "a school of thought holds that," which can sound overly colloquial and vague.
"it is seemingly comprehensible why" -> "it is understandable why"
Explanation: "It is understandable why" is a more direct and formal expression, avoiding the unnecessary word "seemingly" which can weaken the statement’s assertiveness.
"Chief of these is" -> "The primary reason is"
Explanation: "The primary reason is" is more direct and formal, improving clarity and aligning better with academic style.
"With a simple click or tap" -> "With a single click or tap"
Explanation: "With a single click or tap" is more precise and formal, avoiding the colloquial tone of "simple."
"the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and online news apps" -> "the widespread adoption of smartphones, tablets, and online news apps"
Explanation: "The widespread adoption" is a more precise term that better captures the extent of the phenomenon, enhancing the academic tone.
"significantly reduce the appeal" -> "substantially diminish the appeal"
Explanation: "Substantially diminish" is a more formal and precise term than "significantly reduce," fitting better in an academic context.
"underscores the growing obsolescence" -> "emphasizes the increasing obsolescence"
Explanation: "Emphasizes" is more formal and precise than "underscores," and "increasing" is preferred over "growing" for a more academic tone.
"printed newspapers are often seen as more credible" -> "printed newspapers are frequently regarded as more credible"
Explanation: "Frequently regarded as" is more formal and precise than "often seen as," aligning better with academic style.
"This trust is especially pronounced in regions with limited technological infrastructure" -> "This trust is particularly pronounced in regions with limited technological infrastructure"
Explanation: "Particularly" is a more formal synonym for "especially," enhancing the academic tone.
"traditional newspapers are distinguished by their rigorous editorial processes" -> "traditional newspapers are characterized by their rigorous editorial processes"
Explanation: "Characterized by" is a more formal and precise term than "distinguished by," fitting better in an academic context.
"This meticulous scrutiny ensures that the information presented is accurate and reliable" -> "This meticulous scrutiny ensures the accuracy and reliability of the presented information"
Explanation: Rearranging the phrase for clarity and formality improves the sentence structure and flow, aligning better with academic standards.
"it is my firm conviction" -> "I am firmly convinced"
Explanation: "I am firmly convinced" is a more direct and formal expression, suitable for academic writing.

These changes aim to refine the vocabulary and style to better suit an academic essay, enhancing precision, formality, and clarity.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both sides of the argument regarding the future of printed newspapers and magazines. The introduction clearly outlines the two perspectives, and the body paragraphs provide substantial reasoning for both the view that print media will decline and the opposing view that it will persist. The author presents a balanced discussion, which is essential for a high band score. However, while the essay mentions both sides, the argument for the persistence of print media could be further developed with more concrete examples or statistics to strengthen the case.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer could include specific examples of successful print media companies or studies showing continued readership among certain demographics. This would provide a more robust argument for the persistence of printed media.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The writer maintains a clear position in favor of the continuation of printed newspapers and magazines, particularly in the conclusion. The essay begins with a clear statement of the author’s stance, which is consistently supported throughout the text. However, the transition between discussing the decline of print media and the argument for its persistence could be smoother to reinforce the author’s perspective.
- How to improve: To improve clarity and consistency, the author could use transitional phrases that link the discussion of the decline of print media more explicitly to the argument for its persistence. For example, phrases like "Despite these challenges, there are compelling reasons to believe…" could help in maintaining a clear narrative flow.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas regarding the decline and potential persistence of print media. The arguments are logically structured, with the first body paragraph focusing on the decline due to digital media and the second on the reasons for the continued relevance of print. However, some ideas, particularly those supporting the persistence of print media, could be more thoroughly extended with additional examples or elaboration.
- How to improve: The writer should aim to provide more detailed examples or case studies that illustrate the points made. For instance, discussing specific demographics that still prefer print or citing studies on readership trends could strengthen the argument. Additionally, elaborating on the emotional or cultural significance of print media could add depth to the discussion.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains focused on the topic throughout, discussing the future of printed newspapers and magazines without straying into unrelated areas. The writer successfully maintains relevance to the prompt, ensuring that all points made are pertinent to the discussion of print media’s future.
- How to improve: While the essay stays on topic, the writer should ensure that each point made directly ties back to the central question of the future of print media. This could be achieved by explicitly linking each argument back to the prompt in the concluding remarks of each paragraph, reinforcing the connection to the future of printed media.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the task requirements and presents a well-structured argument. To achieve an even higher band score, the writer should focus on providing more specific examples, enhancing transitions between ideas, and ensuring that all points are thoroughly developed and directly linked to the prompt.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, beginning with an introduction that outlines the two opposing views regarding the future of printed media. The body paragraphs are logically organized, with the first paragraph discussing the reasons for the decline of print media and the second paragraph presenting arguments in favor of its continued existence. However, the transition between the two body paragraphs could be smoother. For instance, the shift from discussing the decline to the argument for persistence feels abrupt and could benefit from a clearer linking sentence.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly connect the ideas between paragraphs. For example, after discussing the decline of print media, a sentence like "Despite these challenges, there are compelling reasons to believe that printed media will endure" could serve as a bridge to the next paragraph.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are distinct, which is essential for clarity. However, the second body paragraph could be further divided into two smaller paragraphs to separate the discussion of credibility and the editorial processes of printed media, which would enhance readability and allow for more in-depth exploration of each point.
- How to improve: Consider breaking the second body paragraph into two separate paragraphs: one focusing on the credibility of printed media and the other on the editorial processes that contribute to its reliability. This would allow for a more thorough discussion of each point and improve the overall organization of the essay.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs a variety of cohesive devices, such as "while," "despite," and "additionally," which help to connect ideas within and between sentences. However, the range of cohesive devices could be expanded. For example, the use of more varied linking words and phrases could enhance the flow of ideas and prevent repetition of similar structures.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a broader range of connectors and transitional phrases. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "additionally," consider alternatives like "furthermore," "moreover," or "in addition." Additionally, using phrases like "on the other hand" or "conversely" can help to clarify contrasting ideas and improve the overall coherence of the essay.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of coherence and cohesion, achieving a Band Score of 7. By focusing on smoother transitions, refining paragraph structure, and diversifying cohesive devices, the writer can further enhance the clarity and effectiveness of their arguments.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, employing terms such as "divergent views," "unparalleled accessibility," "democratizes information," and "rigorous editorial processes." These choices reflect a sophisticated understanding of the topic and contribute to the clarity of the arguments presented. The use of phrases like "a school of thought" and "from my standpoint" adds to the essay’s formal tone, which is appropriate for an academic context.
- How to improve: To enhance the range further, the writer could incorporate more varied synonyms and expressions. For instance, instead of repeating "traditional print media," alternatives like "conventional publications" or "hardcopy media" could be used. Additionally, introducing more idiomatic expressions or collocations related to media consumption could enrich the vocabulary.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary with precision, as seen in phrases like "meticulous scrutiny" and "trustworthy sources," which accurately convey the intended meaning. However, there are instances where word choice could be improved for clarity. For example, the phrase "destined to be forgotten" might imply a stronger inevitability than intended. Similarly, "the affordability and accessibility of digital media" could be more precisely articulated as "the cost-effectiveness and ease of access provided by digital media."
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should consider the connotations of words and choose those that best fit the context. For instance, replacing "destined" with "likely" would soften the assertion and make it more nuanced. Additionally, using tools like thesauruses or vocabulary lists specific to the topic can help in selecting the most appropriate words.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors present. Words such as "accessibility," "credibility," and "information" are spelled correctly, demonstrating the writer’s attention to detail in this area.
- How to improve: To maintain and further enhance spelling accuracy, the writer should continue to proofread their work carefully. Engaging in regular spelling exercises or using spell-check tools can also be beneficial. Additionally, familiarizing oneself with commonly misspelled words in academic writing can help prevent future errors.

In summary, the essay showcases a strong command of lexical resource, meriting a band score of 8. By expanding vocabulary range, refining word choice for precision, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can further elevate their writing quality.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a strong command of various sentence structures. For instance, complex sentences like "While a school of thought holds that these traditional forms of media will persist into the future, others claim that they are relics of the past destined to be forgotten" effectively convey contrasting ideas. Additionally, the use of conditional structures, such as "if the world moves towards digital consumption," showcases the writer’s ability to express hypothetical scenarios. However, there is a slight over-reliance on certain structures, such as the use of "it is believed that" and "this shift," which could be varied further.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, the writer could incorporate more compound-complex sentences and use different introductory phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly starting sentences with "this" or "that," the writer could use phrases like "Moreover," "In addition," or "Conversely," to introduce new ideas. Experimenting with different sentence lengths and structures can also add rhythm and interest to the writing.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally showcases a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors present. For instance, the phrase "will be still existed" in the prompt should be corrected to "will still exist." Additionally, punctuation is mostly correct, but there are instances where commas could enhance clarity, such as before conjunctions in complex sentences. For example, in "Despite the aforementioned line of reasoning, it is believed that printed newspapers or magazines in the traditional format will persist into the future," the comma usage is correct, but the sentence could be more fluid with slight rephrasing.
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, the writer should review verb tenses and ensure subject-verb agreement throughout the essay. Regular practice with grammar exercises focusing on common pitfalls, such as verb forms and punctuation rules, can help solidify these skills. Additionally, proofreading for common errors, such as misplaced modifiers or incorrect prepositions, can further enhance the overall quality of the writing.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, meriting a band score of 8. By diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical accuracy, the writer can further elevate their writing to achieve an even higher score.

Bài sửa mẫu

People have divergent views regarding the question of whether printed newspapers or magazines will still exist in the future. While a school of thought holds that these traditional forms of media will persist into the future, others claim that they are relics of the past destined to be forgotten. From my standpoint, I side with the former idea.

Admittedly, it is understandable why advocates subscribe to the view that printed media will eventually be forgotten as the world moves towards digital consumption. The primary reason is the unparalleled accessibility and immediacy offered by digital platforms. With a single click or tap, and the proliferation of smartphones, tablets, and online news apps, readers can instantly access information from anywhere, contributing significantly to the decline of traditional print media. Furthermore, the affordability and accessibility of digital media, with its free or low-cost subscription models, significantly reduce the appeal of traditional print media. This shift not only democratizes information but also underscores the growing obsolescence of print in an increasingly digital world.

Despite the aforementioned line of reasoning, it is believed that printed newspapers or magazines in the traditional format will persist into the future. The primary reason is that printed newspapers are often seen as more credible than digital sources. This trust is especially pronounced in regions with limited technological infrastructure or among populations less comfortable with digital platforms, ensuring that there remains a demand for these publications. Additionally, traditional newspapers are distinguished by their rigorous editorial processes, which involve comprehensive fact-checking and expert review by qualified teams. This meticulous scrutiny ensures that the information presented is accurate and reliable, providing readers with trustworthy sources and maintaining high standards of journalistic integrity.

In conclusion, while there are sufficient justifications supporting the idea that traditional newspapers or magazines are becoming relics of the past and will fade from the memory of readers, it is my firm conviction that they will continue to exist in the future.