Psychologists have known for many years that color can affect how people feel. For this reason, attention should be given to color schemes when decorating places such as offices and hospitals. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Many individuals find themselves trapped in a quagmire of dilemma regarding whether humans’ perceptions can easily be impacted by color palette or not. Therefore, while I acknowledge that adhering to a color principle in public amenities such as hospitals and offices has numerous advantages, I would contend that the advantages of furnishing places according to geomancy are significantly greater, and this perspective deserves careful consideration. This essay will explore the merits of both aforementioned perspectives, arguing that the latter approach offers greater fulfillment and societal benefits.

On the one hand, I agree with the viewpoint that applying an array of different chromatic schemes for utilities’ decorations has some favorable aspects. To commence with, it is irrefutable that the representation of hues not only reflects emotions and messages conveyance but also express cultural meanings as well as brand positioning of each region. According to theoretical knowledge, the combination of bright and neutral color frames in open space are prone to enhance public concentration and energy, which serves as a cornerstone in terms of expediting productivity. As a matter of fact, in striving for a more utopian society, governments are encouraged to allocate a portion of their funds to upgrade social infrastructures’ design and alleviate monochrome environments in order to avoid overlooking talent that can contribute to national development. Moreover, government expenditures related to monochromatic issues are expected to decrease, allowing substantial funds to be redirected toward other social purposes. For instance, investing in addressing mental health issues including anxiety, distress and depression can bolster government resources, facilitating ongoing improvements in social welfare and meeting the needs of the population. Consequently, financial burdens on the government’s budget are likely to be alleviated, paving the way for lucrative salaries, better management, and oversight.

On the flip side, I maintain a strong conviction that a society which schedules facilities based on geomancy brings more significant benefits and should be vigorously encouraged. The key justification for this statement is that the economic sector operates more smoothly and auspiciously in regions where geomantic factors are highly valued. Given that the installation of furniture in public services is conducted elaborately towards topomancy requirements such as: geographical location, religious belief and even color systems, the volume of output produced is likely to increase significantly, contributing to the prosperity of the economy and enhancing tax revenue for the government. As a result, thanks to thorough calculations and fortune, businesses and enterprises can generate profits while providing livelihoods. Furthermore, in an era of international integration, leveraging the mechanism of geomany in forecasting future plans and anticipating potential risks is regarded as more effective and beneficial than solely focusing on decorating societal conveniences associated with color palettes. It is evident that the calculating exchange of technology, capital, human resources, and expertise between nations either encourages socio-economic development or creates more opportunities for individuals and businesses alike. Consequently, both material and spiritual lives are prone to be enhanced, resulting in a more civilized and profound citizenry.

In conclusion, although I believe that a color-oriented environment offers many advantages in relation to societal and governmental features, I am strongly convinced that ensuring a balance between material and spiritual life by utilizing geomantic methods holds greater value and should be subject to scrutiny.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"Many individuals find themselves trapped in a quagmire of dilemma" -> "Many individuals are faced with a dilemma"
Explanation: The phrase "trapped in a quagmire of dilemma" is overly dramatic and redundant. Simplifying it to "are faced with a dilemma" maintains clarity and formality while avoiding unnecessary embellishment.
"adhering to a color principle" -> "adhering to color principles"
Explanation: The term "principle" should be pluralized to "principles" to correctly refer to the multiple guidelines or rules related to color usage.
"furnishing places according to geomancy" -> "designing spaces based on geomancy"
Explanation: "Furnishing" typically refers to equipping with furniture, whereas "designing" is more appropriate for describing the overall aesthetic and layout of spaces. "Based on" is also more precise than "according to" in this context.
"bright and neutral color frames" -> "bright and neutral color schemes"
Explanation: "Color frames" is an unclear and uncommon term. "Color schemes" is the standard term used in design and architecture to describe combinations of colors.
"expediting productivity" -> "enhancing productivity"
Explanation: "Expediting" implies speeding up a process, which is not the intended meaning here. "Enhancing" correctly conveys the idea of improving productivity.
"monochrome environments" -> "monochromatic environments"
Explanation: "Monochrome" typically refers to black and white, whereas "monochromatic" is the correct term for environments with a single color or hue.
"alleviate monochrome environments" -> "address monochromatic issues"
Explanation: "Alleviate" is too vague and informal for this context. "Address" is more specific and appropriate for discussing solutions to problems.
"substantial funds to be redirected toward other social purposes" -> "substantial funds redirected towards other social purposes"
Explanation: Removing "to be" improves the sentence structure and flow, making it more direct and formal.
"addressing mental health issues including anxiety, distress and depression" -> "addressing mental health issues such as anxiety, distress, and depression"
Explanation: "Including" is less formal and can be replaced with "such as" to maintain a formal tone.
"auspiciously" -> "favorably"
Explanation: "Auspiciously" is overly formal and somewhat archaic; "favorably" is more commonly used and maintains the intended positive connotation.
"geomantic factors" -> "geomantic considerations"
Explanation: "Factors" is too broad and vague; "considerations" is more specific and appropriate for discussing the thoughtful evaluation of geomancy in decision-making.
"thorough calculations and fortune" -> "meticulous calculations and consideration of geomancy"
Explanation: "Fortune" is too vague and informal; "consideration of geomancy" is more precise and academically appropriate.
"calculating exchange of technology, capital, human resources, and expertise" -> "strategic exchange of technology, capital, human resources, and expertise"
Explanation: "Calculating" is not the correct term here; "strategic" better describes the planned and intentional exchange of resources.
"more civilized and profound citizenry" -> "more sophisticated and cultured society"
Explanation: "Civilized" and "profound" are vague and less formal; "sophisticated" and "cultured" are more precise and suitable for academic writing.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses the prompt by acknowledging the impact of color schemes in public spaces like hospitals and offices, while also presenting a contrasting view on the importance of geomancy. The introduction clearly states the writer’s position, indicating agreement with the benefits of color schemes but ultimately prioritizing geomancy. However, the essay could benefit from a more direct engagement with the specific question of "to what extent" the writer agrees or disagrees. The phrasing "I would contend that the advantages of furnishing places according to geomancy are significantly greater" suggests a strong disagreement, but the essay does not explicitly quantify this stance.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer should explicitly state the extent of their agreement or disagreement in the introduction and conclusion. This could involve using phrases like "I partially agree" or "I fully disagree" to clarify their position. Additionally, more direct references to the implications of color schemes versus geomancy in the body paragraphs would strengthen the argument.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear position, arguing that geomancy is more beneficial than color schemes. However, the complexity of the language and the introduction of multiple ideas can obscure the main argument. For instance, the mention of government expenditures and mental health issues, while relevant, distracts from the central thesis about color and geomancy.
- How to improve: The writer should aim for greater clarity by simplifying language and ensuring that each paragraph clearly supports the main argument. Using topic sentences that directly relate back to the thesis can help maintain focus. Additionally, the writer should avoid introducing too many ideas in one paragraph, which can dilute the strength of the argument.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents several ideas regarding the benefits of color schemes and geomancy, supported by examples such as government spending and economic benefits. However, some arguments lack depth and specific evidence. For instance, the claim about the benefits of color schemes enhancing productivity is made without citing specific studies or examples, which weakens the argument.
- How to improve: To improve the development of ideas, the writer should include specific examples or studies that support their claims. This could involve citing psychological studies on color effects or historical examples of geomancy in urban planning. Additionally, expanding on each point with more detailed explanations would enhance the overall persuasiveness of the essay.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, discussing the effects of color and geomancy in public spaces. However, some sections drift into broader discussions about government spending and socio-economic development, which, while related, can lead to a loss of focus on the main question.
- How to improve: The writer should ensure that all points made directly relate back to the prompt. This can be achieved by regularly referencing the main question throughout the essay and ensuring that each paragraph contributes to answering "to what extent" the writer agrees or disagrees with the statement. A clearer structure with defined sections for each argument can help maintain focus.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the topic and presents a coherent argument, improvements in clarity, depth of support, and direct engagement with the prompt would enhance the overall effectiveness of the response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure with an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. The introduction effectively outlines the writer’s position and previews the arguments to be discussed. Each body paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the argument, with the first paragraph discussing the benefits of color schemes and the second focusing on geomancy. However, the transition between the two main ideas could be smoother. For instance, the shift from discussing color schemes to geomancy feels abrupt, which can disrupt the logical flow of the essay.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly connect the two ideas. For example, after discussing the advantages of color schemes, a sentence like "However, there is another perspective that merits attention" could serve as a bridge to the next paragraph. Additionally, ensuring that each paragraph begins with a clear topic sentence can help the reader follow the argument more easily.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay utilizes paragraphs effectively, with each paragraph focusing on a distinct point. The first body paragraph discusses the positive impacts of color schemes, while the second explores the benefits of geomancy. However, the paragraphs could be further strengthened by ensuring that each one contains a clear main idea and supporting details that are closely related. Some sentences within the paragraphs feel slightly disjointed or overly complex, which can detract from the overall clarity.
- How to improve: To improve paragraph structure, start each paragraph with a clear topic sentence that encapsulates the main idea. Follow this with supporting sentences that directly relate to the topic sentence. Additionally, consider breaking down complex sentences into simpler ones to enhance readability. For example, in the first body paragraph, the sentence discussing government expenditures could be simplified for clarity.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable use of cohesive devices, such as "On the one hand," "Moreover," and "Consequently," which help to connect ideas within and between paragraphs. However, the range of cohesive devices is somewhat limited, and some transitions could be more varied to avoid repetition. For instance, "As a matter of fact" and "For instance" are used multiple times, which can make the writing feel formulaic.
- How to improve: To diversify the use of cohesive devices, incorporate a wider range of linking words and phrases. For example, instead of repeatedly using "Moreover," consider alternatives like "Additionally," "Furthermore," or "In addition." Also, use devices that indicate contrast or comparison, such as "Conversely" or "In contrast," when transitioning between differing viewpoints. This will not only improve the flow of the essay but also enhance the overall coherence.

In summary, while the essay achieves a solid Band 7 for Coherence and Cohesion, there are areas for improvement, particularly in enhancing logical organization, refining paragraph structure, and diversifying cohesive devices. By implementing these suggestions, the essay can achieve greater clarity and coherence, potentially leading to a higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of vocabulary, employing terms such as "quagmire," "chromatic schemes," "utopian society," and "topomancy." These choices reflect a good understanding of advanced vocabulary and the ability to use it in context. However, some phrases, such as "furnishing places according to geomancy," could be simplified for clarity. The use of "monochrome environments" and "color principle" also showcases a range of vocabulary but may not always be the most accessible for the reader.
- How to improve: To enhance the range of vocabulary, consider incorporating more synonyms or related terms to avoid repetition. For example, instead of repeating "color" or "monochromatic," you could use "hue," "shade," or "palette" in various contexts. Additionally, ensure that the vocabulary used is appropriate for the target audience; simpler alternatives may sometimes convey the message more effectively.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay contains instances of precise vocabulary, such as "enhance public concentration" and "alleviate monochrome environments." However, there are moments where the vocabulary could lead to confusion. For example, the term "geomancy" may not be widely understood, and its usage without explanation could alienate readers unfamiliar with the concept. Additionally, phrases like "economic sector operates more smoothly and auspiciously" may come off as overly complex or vague.
- How to improve: Aim for clarity and precision in vocabulary. When using specialized terms like "geomancy," consider providing a brief definition or context to ensure understanding. Simplifying complex phrases can also help maintain clarity; for instance, instead of "operates more smoothly and auspiciously," you might say "functions more effectively and positively."
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The spelling in the essay is generally accurate, with no glaring errors that detract from the overall quality. Words such as "individuals," "government," and "psychologists" are spelled correctly, reflecting a good command of spelling conventions. However, the term "geomany" appears to be a misspelling of "geomancy," which could confuse readers and affect the essay’s credibility.
- How to improve: To enhance spelling accuracy, consider implementing a proofreading strategy. After completing the essay, take a moment to read through it specifically for spelling errors. Utilizing spell-check tools or having a peer review your work can also help catch mistakes that may be overlooked during writing.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates a strong command of vocabulary and a good range of lexical choices, focusing on clarity, precision, and spelling accuracy will help elevate the score further in the Lexical Resource criteria.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including complex and compound sentences. For instance, the use of phrases like "while I acknowledge that adhering to a color principle in public amenities… has numerous advantages" showcases the ability to combine clauses effectively. Additionally, the sentence "Given that the installation of furniture in public services is conducted elaborately towards topomancy requirements…" illustrates a sophisticated structure that conveys complex ideas. However, there are instances of overly complex constructions that may hinder clarity, such as "the representation of hues not only reflects emotions and messages conveyance but also express cultural meanings as well as brand positioning of each region," which could be simplified for better readability.
- How to improve: To further diversify sentence structures, consider incorporating more varied sentence openings and lengths. For example, starting sentences with adverbial phrases or using different conjunctions can enhance the flow of ideas. Additionally, aim for clarity by balancing complex structures with simpler sentences to ensure the reader can easily follow the argument.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only a few minor errors. For example, the phrase "the representation of hues not only reflects emotions and messages conveyance but also express cultural meanings" contains a subject-verb agreement error; "express" should be "expresses" to match the singular subject "the representation." Furthermore, punctuation is mostly accurate, though there are instances where commas could improve clarity, such as before "which serves as a cornerstone in terms of expediting productivity" to separate the clause more clearly from the preceding phrase.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, focus on subject-verb agreement and ensure that all verbs correctly correspond to their subjects. Additionally, review punctuation rules, particularly regarding the use of commas in complex sentences. Practicing sentence diagramming can also help in visualizing sentence structure and ensuring grammatical correctness.

Overall, the essay is strong in its use of varied structures and grammatical accuracy, but attention to clarity and minor grammatical details will help elevate the writing further.

Bài sửa mẫu

Many individuals find themselves trapped in a quagmire of dilemmas regarding whether human perceptions can easily be impacted by color palettes. Therefore, while I acknowledge that adhering to color principles in public amenities such as hospitals and offices has numerous advantages, I would contend that the benefits of designing spaces based on geomancy are significantly greater, and this perspective deserves careful consideration. This essay will explore the merits of both aforementioned viewpoints, arguing that the latter approach offers greater fulfillment and societal benefits.

On the one hand, I agree with the viewpoint that applying a variety of chromatic schemes for the decoration of public utilities has some favorable aspects. To commence with, it is irrefutable that the representation of hues not only reflects emotions and conveys messages but also expresses cultural meanings as well as brand positioning of each region. According to theoretical knowledge, the combination of bright and neutral color schemes in open spaces is likely to enhance public concentration and energy, serving as a cornerstone for boosting productivity. In striving for a more utopian society, governments are encouraged to allocate a portion of their funds to upgrade the design of social infrastructures and alleviate monochromatic environments in order to avoid overlooking talent that can contribute to national development. Moreover, government expenditures related to monochromatic issues are expected to decrease, allowing substantial funds to be redirected toward other social purposes. For instance, investing in addressing mental health issues such as anxiety, distress, and depression can bolster government resources, facilitating ongoing improvements in social welfare and meeting the needs of the population. Consequently, financial burdens on the government’s budget are likely to be alleviated, paving the way for lucrative salaries, better management, and oversight.

On the flip side, I maintain a strong conviction that a society which organizes facilities based on geomancy brings more significant benefits and should be vigorously encouraged. The key justification for this statement is that the economic sector operates more smoothly and auspiciously in regions where geomantic factors are highly valued. Given that the installation of furniture in public services is conducted meticulously according to topomantic requirements such as geographical location, religious beliefs, and even color systems, the volume of output produced is likely to increase significantly, contributing to the prosperity of the economy and enhancing tax revenue for the government. As a result, thanks to meticulous calculations and considerations of geomancy, businesses and enterprises can generate profits while providing livelihoods. Furthermore, in an era of international integration, leveraging geomantic principles in forecasting future plans and anticipating potential risks is regarded as more effective and beneficial than solely focusing on decorating societal conveniences associated with color palettes. It is evident that the strategic exchange of technology, capital, human resources, and expertise between nations either encourages socio-economic development or creates more opportunities for individuals and businesses alike. Consequently, both material and spiritual lives are likely to be enhanced, resulting in a more sophisticated and cultured society.