Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet, and they can study just as well at home. What is your own opinion?
Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the Internet, and they can study just as well at home.
What is your own opinion?
People believe that schools are easily replaceable with the Internet, as the Internet has everything schools have to offer. I partly disagree with this opinion. I think schools have fundamental natures that can't be replaced by the Internet.
It is reasonable that people think schools aren't necessary, as the Internet is superior to schools in some cases. First and foremost, the information and materials that schools offer can easily be found on the Internet for free. The Internet is a vast library with information about various subjects, such as Maths, Science, and more advanced subjects with a computer or a phone. It is far better than schools or libraries, due to the convenience it brings to the students; it helps them save money, and its flexibility allows them to make changes to fit their schedules, in contrast to the fixed timetables typical of traditional schooling. The ways the Internet presents its content to everyone are diverse, in the form of videos, podcasts, articles, and interactive simulations. The diversity of content enables students to choose which forms are suitable to their learning style and technique, helping enhance not only the student's learning efficiency but also their motivation and commitment to learning. The second reason the Internet is believed to replace schools is that the Internet provides more opportunities to collaborate than schools. Not just for teachers and other students, the Internet has many online forums, discussion groups, or comment sections of content for the learners to discuss with each other or talk with professionals from anywhere. Broadening the opportunities to work with others does not just expand an individual's knowledge and perspective about the subject, but encourages teamwork and enhances their understanding through shared insights and discussions, for example, discussions with many other learners online.
Despite all the advantages of the Internet over schools mentioned above, schools can't be swapped by the Internet for various reasons. Firstly, at schools, the lecturers give the students instructions and guidance. With the teacher's guidance, the students will know what they need to learn, what they need to improve, and what are their strengths and weaknesses. The lack of guidance on the Internet is one of its biggest problems, especially when self-studying because most learners will not know what they don't know, what they need to learn, therefore leading to the lack of fundamental knowledge. Secondly, schools provide structured learning environments that foster discipline and engagement, which can be challenging to replicate online. In-person interactions with teachers and peers enhance communication skills, collaboration, and socialization. Moreover, schools offer access to resources like labs and libraries, promoting hands-on experiences that deepen understanding. This blend of academic and social development ultimately supports well-rounded growth in students.
In conclusion, while the Internet offers remarkable advantages such as access to vast information, diverse learning resources, and collaborative opportunities, it cannot fully replace the essential role of schools in a student's education.