Some people argue that teaching children of different abilities together benefits all of them. Others believe that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

There is a heated debate over whether children of different abilities should be taught together for the benefit of all or if intelligent children should receive separate instruction and special treatment. From my perspective, smarter children should be given different curriculum and better care.
Some people believe that children of different abilities should be taught together for the benefit of all due to many reasons. Firstly, inclusive classrooms provide opportunities for children to interact with peers who have different abilities. Interacting with those with higher ability is believed to improve the learning abilities and confidence of the children. Moreover, in a mixed-ability classroom, students bring various viewpoints and approaches to problem-solving. This diversity can enhance critical thinking and creativity, as students learn from each other's strengths and experiences. For example, a student with a unique way of thinking may offer a solution that others haven't considered.
Despite the reasoning above, I still believe that intelligent children should receive different instruction and special treatment, judging by the fact that gifted children often learn at a faster pace and may grasp concepts more quickly than their peers. Tailoring instruction to meet their advanced learning needs can help keep them engaged and challenged. Besides, smarter ones may face unique social and emotional challenges, such as feeling isolated or misunderstood. Specialized programs can provide a supportive environment where they can connect with like-minded peers. Other than that, advanced instruction can better prepare gifted students for future academic challenges and career opportunities as this ensures they are equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary for success in higher education and beyond.
In conclusion, although teaching children of different abilities together has its own benefits, I still affirm that prodigies should receive a different curriculum and some specialized treatment.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"There is a heated debate" -> "There exists a significant debate"
Explanation: "There exists a significant debate" is more formal and precise, avoiding the colloquial tone of "heated."
"children of different abilities" -> "students with varying abilities"
Explanation: "Students with varying abilities" is more specific and academically appropriate than "children of different abilities," which is somewhat vague and informal.
"should be taught together" -> "should be educated together"
Explanation: "Educated" is a more formal term than "taught," aligning better with academic language.
"smarter children" -> "more academically gifted students"
Explanation: "More academically gifted students" is a more precise and formal way to refer to students with higher abilities, avoiding the informal "smarter children."
"given different curriculum" -> "provided with a customized curriculum"
Explanation: "Provided with a customized curriculum" is more specific and formal, emphasizing the tailored nature of the instruction.
"better care" -> "enhanced support"
Explanation: "Enhanced support" is a more formal and precise term than "better care," which is vague and informal.
"due to many reasons" -> "for several reasons"
Explanation: "For several reasons" is more formal and academically appropriate than "due to many reasons," which is somewhat colloquial.
"Interacting with those with higher ability" -> "Interacting with peers of higher ability"
Explanation: "Peers of higher ability" is more precise and formal, specifying the type of interaction.
"believed to improve" -> "is believed to enhance"
Explanation: "Is believed to enhance" is more formal and academically precise than "believed to improve."
"bring various viewpoints" -> "offer diverse perspectives"
Explanation: "Offer diverse perspectives" is a more formal and precise way to describe the contribution of different students.
"enhance critical thinking and creativity" -> "foster critical thinking and creativity"
Explanation: "Foster" is a more formal verb than "enhance," and it better conveys the nurturing aspect of the process.
"judging by the fact" -> "considering the fact"
Explanation: "Considering the fact" is more formal and appropriate for academic writing than "judging by the fact," which can imply a negative judgment.
"smarter ones" -> "more academically gifted students"
Explanation: "More academically gifted students" is a more formal and precise term than "smarter ones," which is informal and vague.
"advanced instruction" -> "advanced educational programs"
Explanation: "Advanced educational programs" is a more specific and formal term than "advanced instruction," which is somewhat vague.
"ensures they are equipped" -> "ensures their preparation"
Explanation: "Ensures their preparation" is a more formal and concise way to express the idea of readiness for future challenges.

These changes enhance the formality, precision, and clarity of the essay, aligning it more closely with academic writing standards.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Task Response: 7

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses both sides of the argument regarding whether children of different abilities should be taught together or separately. The first body paragraph outlines the benefits of inclusive classrooms, such as improved learning abilities and enhanced critical thinking through diverse interactions. The second body paragraph presents the opposing view, advocating for specialized instruction for intelligent children, citing their unique learning pace and social challenges. However, while both perspectives are discussed, the essay could benefit from a more balanced examination of the arguments, as the second viewpoint is given more weight.
- How to improve: To enhance the response, the writer could include more specific examples or evidence supporting the benefits of mixed-ability classrooms. Additionally, acknowledging potential drawbacks of separate instruction for intelligent children, such as social isolation or lack of collaboration skills, would provide a more nuanced discussion.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The writer clearly states their position in the introduction and maintains it throughout the essay, advocating for specialized treatment for intelligent children. Phrases like "From my perspective" and "I still believe" reinforce this stance. However, the conclusion could be more assertive in reiterating the writer’s opinion, as it somewhat softens the argument by stating "I still affirm" rather than a more definitive statement.
- How to improve: To strengthen the position, the writer should ensure that the conclusion restates their opinion more emphatically. Using stronger language to convey conviction can enhance the overall impact of the argument.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas clearly, with each paragraph focusing on a specific argument. The first paragraph discusses the benefits of inclusive classrooms, while the second elaborates on the needs of intelligent children. However, the support for these ideas could be more robust. For instance, while the essay mentions that gifted children may learn faster, it does not provide specific examples or studies to substantiate this claim.
- How to improve: The writer should aim to incorporate more specific examples, statistics, or research findings to support their claims. This could involve citing studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of specialized programs or the impact of mixed-ability classrooms on student outcomes.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay remains largely focused on the topic, discussing both sides of the argument and the writer’s opinion. However, there are moments where the discussion could be more tightly aligned with the prompt. For instance, the mention of social and emotional challenges faced by gifted children, while relevant, could be elaborated further to connect back to the central argument about educational methods.
- How to improve: To maintain focus, the writer should ensure that every point made directly relates back to the prompt. This could involve explicitly linking the social challenges of gifted children to the need for specialized instruction, thereby reinforcing the argument for separate teaching.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid understanding of the prompt and presents a clear argument. By incorporating more balanced perspectives, robust examples, and maintaining a strong position throughout, the writer can enhance the effectiveness of their response.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents a clear structure, beginning with an introduction that outlines the debate and the author’s perspective. The body paragraphs are organized around two main viewpoints: the benefits of inclusive classrooms and the need for specialized instruction for gifted children. Each paragraph logically develops its point, with supporting arguments and examples. For instance, the first body paragraph effectively discusses the advantages of mixed-ability classrooms, while the second paragraph presents a counter-argument advocating for the needs of intelligent students. However, the transition between the two viewpoints could be smoother, as the shift from discussing inclusive education to specialized instruction feels somewhat abrupt.
- How to improve: To enhance logical flow, consider using transitional phrases that explicitly indicate a shift in perspective, such as "On the other hand" or "Conversely." Additionally, integrating a brief summary sentence at the end of the first body paragraph could help bridge the ideas, reinforcing how the discussion of inclusivity leads into the need for specialized education.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate distinct ideas, with each paragraph focusing on a specific aspect of the argument. The introduction and conclusion are clearly delineated, and the body paragraphs are well-structured, each beginning with a clear topic sentence. However, the second body paragraph could benefit from further subdivision, as it contains multiple ideas that could be more effectively communicated if separated into two distinct paragraphs.
- How to improve: Consider breaking the second body paragraph into two: one focusing on the pace of learning and the need for tailored instruction, and the other addressing the social and emotional challenges faced by gifted students. This would allow for a more focused discussion of each point and improve clarity.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a good use of cohesive devices, such as "Firstly," "Moreover," and "Besides," which help to connect ideas within paragraphs. However, the range of cohesive devices could be expanded. For example, while the use of "for example" is effective, the essay could benefit from additional linking words and phrases that indicate contrast, cause, and effect, which would enhance the overall coherence.
- How to improve: To diversify cohesive devices, incorporate phrases such as "In contrast," "As a result," and "Furthermore." This will not only improve the flow of ideas but also demonstrate a wider range of vocabulary and grammatical structures. Additionally, consider using pronouns and synonyms to avoid repetition and create smoother transitions between sentences.

Overall, the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a balanced discussion of both viewpoints, but there are opportunities to improve the logical organization, paragraph structure, and use of cohesive devices to achieve a higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 8

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary, effectively conveying complex ideas. Terms such as "inclusive classrooms," "critical thinking," "unique way of thinking," and "specialized programs" showcase the writer’s ability to use varied language. The use of phrases like "heeded debate" and "gifted children" also indicates a strong command of vocabulary relevant to the topic.
- How to improve: To further enhance lexical variety, the writer could incorporate more synonyms or related terms to avoid repetition. For instance, instead of repeatedly using "intelligent children," alternatives like "gifted students" or "high-achieving learners" could be employed. Additionally, integrating more academic or nuanced vocabulary related to educational theories could elevate the essay’s sophistication.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary accurately, with phrases like "different curriculum" and "better care" clearly conveying the intended meaning. However, the phrase "smarter children" could be perceived as overly simplistic or informal. The term "prodigies" in the conclusion, while precise, may not universally apply to all gifted children, potentially leading to ambiguity.
- How to improve: To improve precision, the writer should aim for more formal and specific language. For example, replacing "smarter children" with "highly capable students" or "academically gifted individuals" would enhance the formality and clarity of the argument. Additionally, ensuring that terms like "prodigies" are used in contexts where they accurately reflect the intended meaning will strengthen the overall precision of vocabulary.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no noticeable errors. Words such as "curriculum," "abilities," and "instruction" are spelled correctly, reflecting a strong command of the language.
- How to improve: While spelling is already strong, the writer can maintain this level by continuing to proofread their work and utilizing spell-check tools. Engaging in regular reading and writing practice will also help reinforce correct spelling patterns and enhance overall language proficiency.

Overall, the essay effectively utilizes a wide range of vocabulary with a high degree of precision and accuracy in spelling. By focusing on enhancing lexical variety, improving the formality and specificity of vocabulary, and maintaining spelling accuracy, the writer can further elevate their lexical resource score in future essays.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 8

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, including simple, compound, and complex sentences. For instance, the use of complex sentences is evident in phrases like "Despite the reasoning above, I still believe that intelligent children should receive different instruction and special treatment," which effectively conveys nuanced ideas. Additionally, the essay employs a range of linking words and phrases such as "Firstly," "Moreover," and "Besides," which enhance the coherence and flow of the argument. However, there are instances where sentence structures could be further diversified, particularly in the use of passive voice or conditional sentences to add depth to the argument.
- How to improve: To enhance the variety of sentence structures, consider incorporating more complex grammatical forms, such as conditional sentences (e.g., "If intelligent children are taught separately, they may benefit more from tailored instruction") or using the passive voice to shift focus (e.g., "Special treatment is often provided to gifted children"). Additionally, varying the length and rhythm of sentences can create a more engaging reading experience.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits a high level of grammatical accuracy, with only minor errors. For example, the phrase "smarter children should be given different curriculum" contains a grammatical error; "curriculum" should be pluralized to "curricula" or rephrased to "a different curriculum." Punctuation is mostly correct, with appropriate use of commas to separate clauses and items in a list. However, there are a few instances where commas could enhance clarity, such as before "judging by the fact" in the sentence "Despite the reasoning above, I still believe that intelligent children should receive different instruction and special treatment, judging by the fact that gifted children often learn at a faster pace."
- How to improve: To improve grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to subject-verb agreement and the correct use of singular and plural forms. Additionally, review punctuation rules, particularly regarding the use of commas in complex sentences. Reading the essay aloud can help identify areas where punctuation might enhance clarity. Furthermore, consider using grammar-checking tools or peer reviews to catch minor errors before final submission.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of grammatical range and accuracy, justifying the Band 8 score. By focusing on diversifying sentence structures and refining grammatical precision, the writer can further enhance the quality of their writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

Some people believe that children of different abilities should be taught together for the benefit of all for several reasons. Firstly, inclusive classrooms provide opportunities for children to interact with peers who have varying abilities. Interacting with those of higher ability is believed to enhance the learning abilities and confidence of the children. Moreover, in a mixed-ability classroom, students bring diverse perspectives and approaches to problem-solving. This diversity can foster critical thinking and creativity, as students learn from each other’s strengths and experiences. For example, a student with a unique way of thinking may offer a solution that others haven’t considered.

Despite the reasoning above, I still believe that intelligent children should receive different instruction and special treatment, considering the fact that gifted children often learn at a faster pace and may grasp concepts more quickly than their peers. Tailoring instruction to meet their advanced educational needs can help keep them engaged and challenged. Besides, smarter students may face unique social and emotional challenges, such as feeling isolated or misunderstood. Specialized programs can provide a supportive environment where they can connect with like-minded peers. Furthermore, advanced instruction can better prepare gifted students for future academic challenges and career opportunities, as this ensures they are equipped with the skills and knowledge necessary for success in higher education and beyond.

In conclusion, although teaching children of different abilities together has its own benefits, I still affirm that prodigies should receive a different curriculum and some specialized treatment.