Some people believe that every human can create art. Other people think that art can only be created by people with special talents. Discuss both view and give your opinion

With the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence and the increasing visual literacy, people no longer perceive composing art as an esoteric ability. However, others argue that amateur pieces are dedicated for individual purposes, contradicting the true essence of art which emphasizes meaningful messages with an immersive impact. In my opinion, I agree with the latter view and believe that generating artworks should be subject to creators with inborn talent.

From the perspectives of many people, everyone can participate in the art generating process without special ability. In this day and age, the advent of generative AI has revolutionized our thinking about the creative industry since aesthetically pleasing artworks are now algorithmically generated by user prompts only. In other words, not having a knack of art, people can still produce their work by inputting prompts into models. To be more specific, the models will analyze users’ input texts, incorporating several machine learning techniques to decode those texts into images. This generating process is timelessly repeated and has become the brain behind a large number of visually impressive and impactful images on the Internet. For instance, if users want to create an artwork that aligns only for their personal use, they can leverage the brilliant generating ability of ChatGPT, Stable Diffusion to meet their needs. In addition to this point, the increasing embrace of art also accompanies with more people knowing how to produce art. That said, the more visually literate people are, the more people pursue artwork endeavors. As revealed by recent research, five out of ten people who were asked about future careers answered that they want to pursue artistic disciplines such as singers, actors, and musicians. This trend directly leads to the prevalent ability of composing art among people, therefore, art generation is not exclusive to professional creators anymore.

However, observing only the surface of the problem while neglecting a broader picture of the essence of art will be a short-sighted approach. From my perspective, although artificial intelligence can generate art, that’s not genuine from their creative endeavor. Given that the essence of art prioritizes disseminating subliminal messages and creativity to a wide range of people, automatic-generated artworks clearly contradict it. As revealed by many big tech corporations, models are trained on billions of tokens, details, composing styles of many prominent artists, and poems to generate. In other words, they are not an independent creative entity, but more or less an imitator. Computerized models are equipped with technical abilities to visualize users' imagination into real images but their artworks often lack creativity and novelty which are the instrumental elements constructing a brilliant artwork. Hence, most of their artworks have a short-term impression with a low opinion from experts and the society. In contrast, creative endeavors of gifted artists, combined with their lofty passion and dignity, could bring a new lease of life into both the industry, inspiring people’s life. If we no longer have qualified creators, not only will the artificial intelligence age meet a disappointing end but also deteriorate our art industry. Moreover, as we observed many prominent artists in history, what sets gifted creators apart from others is the quality they produce. While amateur generated arts have the dim view of revolutionizing the industry and they mostly serve as a form of self-entertainment, highly-qualified pieces produced by skillful creators, in contrast, are dedicated to the greater good of humanity. Evidenced by the Mona Lisa painting of Leonardo Da Vinci, its messages have echoed for centuries after the talented painter died and left an indelible mark on human civilization.

In summary, everyone is now gifted with the ability to create art, thanks to the advancement of technology and the increased visual education. However, I still believe it remains within the realms of talented artists whose artworks align seamlessly with the essence of art and leave a massive impression on human history

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"With the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence and the increasing visual literacy" -> "With the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence and the growing visual literacy"
Explanation: "growing" is a more precise term than "increasing" in this context, as it implies a gradual and ongoing development, which is more accurate for describing the evolution of visual literacy.
"people no longer perceive composing art as an esoteric ability" -> "people no longer view artistic composition as an esoteric ability"
Explanation: "view artistic composition" is a more formal and precise phrase than "composing art," which is somewhat vague and informal.
"amateur pieces are dedicated for individual purposes" -> "amateur creations are intended for personal purposes"
Explanation: "intended for personal purposes" is more formal and precise than "dedicated for individual purposes," which is awkwardly phrased.
"generating artworks should be subject to creators with inborn talent" -> "the creation of artworks should be reserved for those with innate talent"
Explanation: "reserved for those with innate talent" is more formal and precise, emphasizing the exclusivity and natural ability required for artistic creation.
"everyone can participate in the art generating process without special ability" -> "anyone can engage in the artistic process without requiring special talent"
Explanation: "engage in the artistic process" is more formal and precise than "participate in the art generating process," and "requiring special talent" is clearer than "without special ability."
"aesthetically pleasing artworks are now algorithmically generated by user prompts only" -> "aesthetically pleasing artworks are now algorithmically generated solely through user prompts"
Explanation: "solely through user prompts" is more precise and formal than "by user prompts only," which is somewhat informal.
"not having a knack of art" -> "lacking artistic aptitude"
Explanation: "lacking artistic aptitude" is a more formal and precise term than "not having a knack of art," which is colloquial.
"the models will analyze users’ input texts, incorporating several machine learning techniques to decode those texts into images" -> "the models analyze user input texts, employing various machine learning techniques to decode these texts into images"
Explanation: "employing various machine learning techniques" is more formal and precise than "incorporating several machine learning techniques," and "these texts" is more formal than "those texts."
"timelessly repeated" -> "repeated continuously"
Explanation: "repeated continuously" is a more accurate and formal way to describe the ongoing process of generating images.
"the increasing embrace of art also accompanies with more people knowing how to produce art" -> "the increasing appreciation of art is accompanied by a growing number of people who can produce art"
Explanation: "is accompanied by a growing number of people who can produce art" is more formal and clearer than "accompanies with more people knowing how to produce art."
"the more visually literate people are, the more people pursue artwork endeavors" -> "the more visually literate individuals become, the more they pursue artistic endeavors"
Explanation: "the more visually literate individuals become" is more formal and precise than "the more people are," and "they pursue artistic endeavors" is more formal than "people pursue artwork endeavors."
"observing only the surface of the problem while neglecting a broader picture of the essence of art" -> "examining only the superficial aspects of the issue while overlooking the broader essence of art"
Explanation: "examining only the superficial aspects of the issue" and "overlooking the broader essence of art" are more formal and precise than "observing only the surface of the problem" and "neglecting a broader picture of the essence of art."
"automatic-generated artworks clearly contradict it" -> "automatically generated artworks clearly contradict this"
Explanation: "automatically generated artworks" is more precise and formal than "automatic-generated artworks," and "this" is more appropriate than "it" in this context.
"Computerized models are equipped with technical abilities to visualize users’ imagination into real images" -> "computerized models possess technical capabilities to visualize users’ imaginations into real images"
Explanation: "possess technical capabilities" is more formal and precise than "are equipped with technical abilities," and "imagination" should be plural to match "users’."
"their artworks often lack creativity and novelty" -> "their artworks frequently lack creativity and originality"
Explanation: "frequently lack creativity and originality" is more formal and precise than "often lack creativity and novelty."
"not only will the artificial intelligence age meet a disappointing end but also deteriorate our art industry" -> "not only will the artificial intelligence era meet a disappointing conclusion but also undermine our art industry"
Explanation

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Task Response: 6

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay addresses both perspectives: the belief that anyone can create art with advancements in technology, and the opposing view that true art requires special talent. It discusses both views and provides a clear opinion.
- How to improve: While the essay covers both views adequately, it could benefit from deeper exploration of how each perspective relates to the essence of art, providing more nuanced examples or counterarguments.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent position that aligns with the belief that art creation should be left to those with special talent. This stance is articulated clearly in the introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion.
- How to improve: To strengthen clarity, ensure that the opinion is reiterated or reinforced in each paragraph, linking arguments back to the central thesis consistently.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay presents ideas clearly with examples, such as the role of AI in generating art and the historical significance of gifted artists’ work. Each idea is elaborated upon sufficiently to support the argument.
- How to improve: To enhance depth, consider expanding on the implications of AI-generated art beyond personal use, and provide additional examples or case studies to enrich the discussion.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally stays on topic, focusing on whether art can be created by everyone or only by those with innate talent. However, there are moments where the discussion on AI-generated art could veer slightly off-topic.
- How to improve: Ensure all examples and discussions directly relate to the prompt by consistently linking them back to the central theme of who can create art and how.

Overall, the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a coherent argument. To improve, the candidate should focus on deeper analysis of perspectives, reinforcing their stance throughout, expanding examples and maintaining strict relevance to the topic.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a clear organizational structure. It starts with an introduction that outlines both views, followed by two body paragraphs presenting arguments supporting each view, and concludes with a concise summary of the author’s opinion. Each paragraph transitions smoothly into the next, maintaining coherence throughout.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider explicitly connecting ideas between paragraphs. Use transition words or phrases to guide the reader through the progression of arguments more smoothly. For instance, adding transitional phrases like "On the other hand" or "In contrast" could help clarify shifts between viewpoints.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively uses paragraphs to separate different ideas. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the topic, such as the role of AI in art creation or the importance of creativity in art. Topic sentences introduce each paragraph’s main point, providing a clear structure.
- How to improve: To further improve paragraph structure, ensure each paragraph maintains a consistent focus on its main idea. Avoid introducing new arguments within existing paragraphs and consider developing each idea fully before moving on to the next.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: Cohesive devices such as pronouns ("this", "that"), conjunctions ("however", "moreover"), and transitional phrases ("in summary", "as revealed by") are used throughout the essay. These devices help link ideas within sentences and paragraphs, enhancing coherence.
- How to improve: To diversify cohesive devices, incorporate more advanced linking words or phrases that indicate causation ("therefore", "consequently") or contrast ("despite", "although"). This will add depth to your argumentation and further strengthen the logical flow of your essay.

Overall, the essay effectively addresses the essay prompt by presenting both perspectives and providing a clear opinion. Enhancing the use of advanced cohesive devices and refining the transitions between paragraphs will elevate the coherence and cohesion of your writing, potentially pushing your score higher in future assessments.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of vocabulary throughout. For example, terms like "esoteric," "aesthetically pleasing," "algorithmically generated," and "visually literate" showcase a broad lexical repertoire. These terms are effectively used to discuss different facets of art creation and technology.
- How to improve: To further enhance lexical diversity, consider incorporating more nuanced synonyms or idiomatic expressions where appropriate. Additionally, strive to integrate domain-specific vocabulary related to art and technology to deepen the analysis.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The precision of vocabulary usage varies. While terms like "generating process," "artificial intelligence," and "subliminal messages" are used effectively, there are instances where vocabulary could be more precise. For instance, phrases like "not having a knack of art" could be refined to "lacking artistic aptitude," which would elevate the precision of expression.
- How to improve: Focus on using terminology that precisely conveys intended meanings without ambiguity. This could involve using context-specific vocabulary related to art and creativity, ensuring each term used aligns precisely with the intended concept.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Spelling accuracy is generally strong, with only minor errors noted (e.g., "timelessly repeated" could be revised to "repeatedly" for clarity). Overall, the essay demonstrates a high level of spelling proficiency.
- How to improve: Maintain consistency in proofreading to catch minor errors and consider utilizing spell-check tools to ensure flawless spelling throughout.

This essay effectively utilizes a wide range of vocabulary to discuss the topic of art creation and the role of technology, demonstrating a strong command of language. To enhance further, focus on precision in vocabulary usage and maintain consistent spelling accuracy. These refinements will contribute to an even stronger presentation of ideas in future writing endeavors.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a varied use of sentence structures, including complex sentences ("From the perspectives of many people, everyone can participate in the art generating process without special ability"), compound sentences ("In this day and age, the advent of generative AI…"), and conditional constructions ("If users want to create an artwork…"). These structures contribute to the essay’s coherence and provide clarity in presenting arguments.
- How to improve: To further enhance sentence variety, consider integrating more rhetorical devices such as parallelism or varying the length of sentences for stylistic impact. This can add depth to your arguments and engage the reader more effectively.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally maintains good grammatical accuracy with minimal errors. For example, "not having a knack of art" could be improved to "not having a knack for art". Punctuation is mostly used correctly to separate ideas and clauses, although occasional minor errors in comma placement were noted.
- How to improve: Focus on consistently using articles ("the", "an") correctly, particularly with singular and plural nouns. Review comma rules, especially for introductory phrases and clauses, to ensure precise punctuation that aids clarity and flow.

Overall, the essay effectively achieves a Band Score of 7 for Grammatical Range and Accuracy by showcasing a commendable range of sentence structures and maintaining generally accurate grammar and punctuation usage. Continuing to refine these aspects will further elevate the clarity and sophistication of your writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

With the rapid expansion of artificial intelligence and the growing visual literacy, people no longer view artistic composition as an esoteric ability. Yet, some argue that amateur creations are intended for personal purposes, diverging from the true essence of art, which emphasizes conveying meaningful messages with a profound impact. In my view, I side with the belief that the creation of artworks should be reserved for those with innate talent.

Many argue that anyone can engage in the artistic process without requiring special talent. In today’s world, generative AI has transformed our perception of the creative industry, as aesthetically pleasing artworks are now algorithmically generated solely through user prompts. Essentially, lacking artistic aptitude does not prevent people from producing their own works by feeding prompts into AI models. These models analyze user input texts, employing various machine learning techniques to decode these texts into images, a process repeated continuously. This advancement has led to a proliferation of visually striking and impactful images online. For example, users seeking personalized artworks can leverage the creative capabilities of AI models like ChatGPT and Stable Diffusion.

Moreover, the increasing appreciation of art is accompanied by a growing number of people who can produce art. As people become more visually literate, they are more likely to pursue artistic endeavors. Research indicates that a significant proportion of individuals express interest in artistic careers, such as singers, actors, and musicians, reflecting a broadening participation in artistic creation among the populace.

However, by focusing only on the superficial aspects of the issue and overlooking the broader essence of art, proponents of unrestricted art creation overlook a critical point. From my perspective, while artificially generated artworks may visually appeal, they often lack the depth of creativity and originality essential to genuine artistic expression. Computerized models possess technical capabilities to visualize users’ imaginations into real images, but their artworks frequently lack creativity and originality. These automated creations, although technically proficient, fail to embody the essence of art which prioritizes conveying profound messages and igniting creativity among audiences.

In contrast, the creations of talented artists, driven by their passion and skill, breathe life into the art industry and inspire humanity. Works like Leonardo Da Vinci’s Mona Lisa endure through centuries, leaving an indelible mark on human civilization with their depth and creativity.

In conclusion, while advancements in technology and visual education empower more individuals to create art, I maintain that the most profound and enduring artworks stem from talented creators. These artists possess a unique ability to convey messages that resonate deeply with society, enriching human experience and leaving a lasting impact on our cultural heritage. Thus, while technology democratizes art creation, true artistic mastery remains the domain of those gifted with innate talent and creative vision.