Some people believe that the best way to increase road safety is by implementing stricter laws for drivers, while others think that improving road infrastructure is more effective. Do you agree or disagree with either of these viewpoints?

While many people want to focus on implementing stricter laws for drivers to have road protection, others believe that enhancing road facilities is better. In my opinion, the government should tighten laws for traffic participants.
It is understandable why many people believe that improving road structure is the best way because of the convenience. When people can move on wide and flat roads with many lanes divided by vehicles such as trucks, buses, motorbikes and pedestrians, they will not face dislocations, overcrowding that causes an accident. If people can have modern road facilities such as lane markings, traffic lights, and warning signs, they will feel safer. For instance, in Vietnam, the government decided to set up cameras on the road to punish some people who do not stop at red lights to avoid accidents because it makes them pursue the laws better. However, there are still some situations in which vehicles do not stay in their lanes.
For some people who agree with giving laws for drivers, I also agree with this point of view because traffic laws can help police control and limit traffic accidents. Most laws are set up for people to follow when participating in social activities; if they violate them, they will receive punishments. This helps improve people's self-awareness because they do not want to lose money or have their driver's license confiscated. For example, currently, in Vietnam, the government fines heavily and even confiscates driver's licenses for those who drink and drive. This has limited accidents caused by alcohol
In conclusion, I still believe that the government should focus on giving laws for people to protect the population when participating in traffic.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

"many people want to focus on implementing stricter laws" -> "many advocate for the implementation of stricter laws"
Explanation: The phrase "advocate for the implementation of" is more formal and precise, enhancing the academic tone of the sentence.
"drivers to have road protection" -> "drivers to ensure road safety"
Explanation: "Ensure road safety" is a more specific and formal expression than "have road protection," which is vague and less commonly used in formal writing.
"enhancing road facilities" -> "enhancing road infrastructure"
Explanation: "Infrastructure" is a more specific term in the context of roads, indicating the physical structures and systems that support them, which is more precise than "facilities," which is too general.
"tighten laws for traffic participants" -> "strengthen traffic regulations"
Explanation: "Strengthen traffic regulations" is a more formal and precise term than "tighten laws for traffic participants," which is awkwardly phrased and less commonly used in formal writing.
"improving road structure" -> "improving road infrastructure"
Explanation: As mentioned earlier, "infrastructure" is more specific and appropriate for describing the physical structures of roads, enhancing the academic tone.
"move on wide and flat roads" -> "travel on wide and flat roads"
Explanation: "Travel" is a more formal verb than "move," which is somewhat informal and vague in this context.
"divided by vehicles such as trucks, buses, motorbikes and pedestrians" -> "divided by various vehicles, including trucks, buses, motorbikes, and pedestrians"
Explanation: "Including" is more precise and formal than "such as," which can imply a non-exhaustive list, and "various" adds variety to the description.
"they will not face dislocations, overcrowding that causes an accident" -> "they will avoid dislocations and overcrowding, which can lead to accidents"
Explanation: "Avoid" is more precise than "not face," and "which can lead to accidents" is a clearer and more formal way of expressing causality.
"modern road facilities such as lane markings, traffic lights, and warning signs" -> "advanced road features such as lane markings, traffic signals, and warning signs"
Explanation: "Advanced" is more specific and formal than "modern," and "traffic signals" is a more precise term than "traffic lights," which is less formal.
"pursue the laws better" -> "comply more closely with the laws"
Explanation: "Comply more closely with the laws" is a more formal and precise way of expressing the idea of following laws more strictly.
"vehicles do not stay in their lanes" -> "vehicles fail to remain within their designated lanes"
Explanation: "Fail to remain within their designated lanes" is a more formal and precise description of the issue.
"Most laws are set up for people to follow" -> "Most laws are enacted to regulate the behavior of individuals"
Explanation: "Enacted to regulate the behavior of individuals" is a more formal and precise way of describing the purpose of laws, enhancing the academic tone.
"they will receive punishments" -> "they will incur penalties"
Explanation: "Incur penalties" is a more formal and precise term than "receive punishments," which is somewhat informal and vague.
"fines heavily and even confiscates driver’s licenses" -> "impose heavy fines and confiscate driver’s licenses"
Explanation: "Impose" is more formal than "fine," and "confiscate" is the correct verb form for the action of taking away licenses.
"protect the population" -> "ensure public safety"
Explanation: "Ensure public safety" is a more specific and formal expression than "protect the population," which is vague and less commonly used in formal writing.

Some people believe that the best way to increase road safety is by implementing stricter laws for drivers, while others think that improving road infrastructure is more effective. Do you agree or disagree with either of these viewpoints?