Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others believe individuals can also do some things to solve these problems. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

One school of thought holds that individuals are not feasible to resolve environmental issues. Others believe that individuals can contribute their efforts to the success of environmental protection. From my point of view, I agree with the latter statement because individuals are fully capable to tackle these problems.

It is irrefutable that some environmental problems are utterly difficult to deal with. In order for serious problems, such as industrial waste and greenhouse gases, to be effectively tackled, it requires efforts and cooperation from governments and large environmental organizations. This is because solving such issues requires special methods. A normal citizen is not entitled to prohibit environmental-damaging behaviors, but state authorities can. Governments or Parliaments have legal rights to issue laws to forbid negative activities or encourage citizens to have more friendly-environment behaviors. Only state agencies have sufficient resources and funds to conduct these actions.

However, addressing environmental problems is also individual’s responsibilities. Each person plays their own role in this process with the governments to resolve these problems through various ways, such as reusing plastic bags, planting more trees, or stopping illegal littering. When there is no cooperation between governments and individuals, environmental issues will never be effectively tackled. For instance, if citizens have a habit of illegal littering, the problem of greenhouse gases will never be mitigated.

In conclusion, I support the idea that the support from individuals is crucial for authorities to address environmental issues that are detrimentally increasing. Creating awareness regarding these environment-friendly acts for ordinary citizens will make this world a better place.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

"From my point of view" -> "In my opinion"
Explanation: "From my point of view" is a more colloquial expression, while "In my opinion" is a commonly used and formal alternative in academic writing.
"It is irrefutable that" -> "It is undeniable that"
Explanation: "Irrefutable" is a strong term and might sound too assertive. "Undeniable" is a more appropriate choice for maintaining a formal tone.
"utterly difficult" -> "extremely challenging"
Explanation: "Utterly difficult" is a less formal expression. Replacing it with "extremely challenging" maintains formality while conveying a similar meaning.
"negative activities" -> "detrimental activities"
Explanation: "Negative activities" is a broad term, while "detrimental activities" is more specific and formal, enhancing precision in the context of environmental issues.
"friendly-environment behaviors" -> "environmentally friendly behaviors"
Explanation: "Friendly-environment behaviors" is a non-standard expression. "Environmentally friendly behaviors" is the correct and formal term for actions that contribute to environmental well-being.
"state authorities" -> "government authorities"
Explanation: "State authorities" may sound more regional, while "government authorities" is a broader and more universally accepted term in academic writing.
"Have legal rights" -> "Possess the legal authority"
Explanation: "Have legal rights" is slightly informal. Replacing it with "Possess the legal authority" adds formality and precision to the statement.
"conduct these actions" -> "undertake these initiatives"
Explanation: "Conduct these actions" is a generic phrase. "Undertake these initiatives" is more specific and aligns with a formal academic tone.
"Citizens" -> "Individuals"
Explanation: "Citizens" can be too specific. Using "Individuals" is a more inclusive term that encompasses a broader range of people, including non-citizens.
"illegal littering" -> "unlawful disposal of litter"
Explanation: "Illegal littering" is somewhat informal. "Unlawful disposal of litter" is a more formal and precise term for addressing inappropriate waste management.
"will make this world a better place" -> "will contribute to global improvement"
Explanation: "Make this world a better place" is a common phrase and might be seen as cliché. "Contribute to global improvement" maintains formality and offers a more sophisticated expression.

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

Answer All Parts of the Question:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively addresses all parts of the question. It presents both perspectives (individuals being incapable vs. capable of solving environmental issues) and provides a clear opinion in favor of the latter. Relevant sections are cited to support this observation.
- How to improve: The essay could enhance its analysis by delving deeper into the challenges associated with individuals solving complex environmental problems. Providing specific examples or counterarguments would strengthen the depth of the response.
Present a Clear Position Throughout:
- Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a consistent and clear position throughout. The writer’s stance in favor of individuals contributing to environmental protection is evident from the introduction to the conclusion. Specific examples are provided to support this stance.
- How to improve: To further enhance clarity, consider explicitly stating the main points that will be discussed in each paragraph. This can act as a roadmap for the reader, making it easier to follow the argument.
Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:
- Detailed explanation: The essay effectively presents ideas and supports them with examples. It discusses the roles of both individuals and governments, providing specific instances such as reusing plastic bags and the impact of illegal littering on greenhouse gases.
- How to improve: To extend ideas, the essay could explore more nuanced examples or delve deeper into the potential impact of individual actions. Providing data or statistics would add weight to the argument.
Stay on Topic:
- Detailed explanation: The essay mostly stays on topic, discussing the role of individuals in addressing environmental problems. However, there is a slight deviation when discussing the role of governments, but it does not significantly detract from the overall focus.
- How to improve: To improve focus, ensure that examples related to the government’s role directly tie back to the individual’s capacity to contribute. This will maintain a more cohesive argument.

Overall, this essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the prompt, effectively presenting and supporting ideas. To improve, it could delve deeper into the challenges associated with individual action, explicitly state main points in each paragraph for clarity, explore more nuanced examples, and ensure all examples tie directly to the main argument.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 7

Organize Information Logically:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information. It begins with a clear introduction, presenting both views, and transitions smoothly between paragraphs. The central ideas are presented in a coherent manner. However, there is room for improvement in the organization within paragraphs. For instance, the paragraph discussing the difficulty of solving environmental problems could be more structured, with a clear topic sentence and supporting details.
- How to improve: To enhance logical organization, ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence, followed by supporting details. Consider providing a roadmap for the reader in the introduction to outline the essay’s structure.
Use Paragraphs:
- Detailed explanation: The essay employs paragraphs effectively, generally maintaining a clear structure. Each paragraph focuses on a specific aspect of the argument, contributing to the overall coherence. However, as mentioned earlier, some paragraphs lack a strong topic sentence, affecting the clarity of the main point.
- How to improve: Strengthen paragraph structure by incorporating clear topic sentences that convey the main idea of each paragraph. This helps the reader understand the purpose of each section and the overall argument.
Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:
- Detailed explanation: The essay makes use of cohesive devices to connect ideas and facilitate the reader’s understanding. Transition words and phrases (e.g., "however," "in conclusion") are employed, contributing to the overall coherence. However, there is room for improvement in the variety of cohesive devices used.
- How to improve: Diversify the use of cohesive devices to create a smoother flow. Consider using a wider range of transition words and phrases to link ideas within and between sentences. This will enhance the overall cohesion of the essay.

In summary, while the essay effectively organizes information at a macro level, there is room for improvement in paragraph-level organization and the use of cohesive devices. Strengthening these aspects will contribute to a more coherent and cohesive presentation of ideas.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 6

Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:
- Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a reasonable range of vocabulary, with varied terms such as "irrefutable," "friendly-environment behaviors," and "detrimentally increasing." However, there is room for improvement as certain concepts are expressed with somewhat repetitive language.
- How to improve: To enhance vocabulary diversity, consider introducing synonyms and alternative expressions for key ideas. For instance, explore different ways to convey the notion of environmental responsibility and the impact of individual actions.
Use Vocabulary Precisely:
- Detailed explanation: The vocabulary usage is generally appropriate, but there are instances of imprecise language. For example, the term "special methods" is vague and could benefit from clarification.
- How to improve: Aim for precision by specifying the nature of "special methods" required for addressing environmental issues. Providing concrete examples or elaborating on specific strategies would enhance the clarity and precision of the vocabulary.
Use Correct Spelling:
- Detailed explanation: Overall, spelling accuracy is satisfactory. However, there are a few instances of minor errors, such as "Parliaments" (should be "parliaments"). These do not significantly impede comprehension.
- How to improve: Continue paying attention to detail in spelling. Reviewing written work carefully before submission can help catch and rectify minor spelling errors. Additionally, consider using spell-check tools to minimize such oversights.

In summary, the essay demonstrates a competent level of lexical resource, earning a Band Score of 6. To further enhance lexical variety, strive for more diverse expressions, and ensure precision in conveying ideas. Spelling accuracy is generally good, but continued vigilance can help eliminate minor errors.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

Use a Wide Range of Structures:
- Detailed explanation: The essay displays a satisfactory range of sentence structures. It effectively employs simple, compound, and complex sentences. For instance, the use of complex sentences is evident in the statement, "It is irrefutable that some environmental problems are utterly difficult to deal with." However, there is room for improvement in terms of sentence variety. The essay tends to rely on straightforward sentence structures, and a more diverse array, including varied lengths and complexities, would enhance overall fluency and engagement.
- How to improve: To diversify sentence structures, consider incorporating more compound-complex sentences and varying sentence lengths. For instance, try combining short sentences or breaking down long ones to create a smoother flow. This will add nuance to your writing and maintain the reader’s interest.
Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:
- Detailed explanation: The essay generally exhibits accurate grammar and punctuation usage. However, there are instances where subject-verb agreement issues arise, such as in the phrase "the problem of greenhouse gases will never be mitigated," where "gases" should agree with the singular verb "will." Additionally, a comma splice is present in the sentence, "For instance, if citizens have a habit of illegal littering, the problem of greenhouse gases will never be mitigated." This could be rectified by using a semicolon or breaking the sentence into two.
- How to improve: To enhance grammatical accuracy, pay close attention to subject-verb agreement, ensuring consistency in singular and plural forms. Regarding punctuation, be mindful of comma splices and explore alternative punctuation marks like semicolons or periods for clarity. Proofreading your work systematically will help identify and correct such errors.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a solid command of grammar and structure. By incorporating more sentence variety and addressing minor grammatical issues, you can further elevate the quality of your writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

One perspective suggests that addressing environmental challenges is beyond the capacity of individuals. Conversely, some argue that individuals can play a role in environmental protection. In my opinion, I align with the latter viewpoint, as I believe individuals possess the capability to contribute significantly to addressing these issues.

It is undeniable that certain environmental problems pose significant challenges. Effectively addressing issues like industrial waste and greenhouse gases requires concerted efforts and collaboration from governments and large environmental organizations. This is because specialized methods are needed, and the legal authority to prohibit environmentally detrimental behaviors lies with the government. Governments and parliaments possess the legal authority to enact laws that forbid negative activities or encourage citizens to adopt more environmentally friendly behaviors. State agencies are the entities equipped with adequate resources and funds to implement these actions.

Nevertheless, the responsibility to address environmental problems also rests on individuals. Each person plays a crucial role in collaboration with governments to tackle these issues through various means, such as reusing plastic bags, planting more trees, or preventing the unlawful disposal of litter. Without cooperation between governments and individuals, environmental issues cannot be effectively addressed. For instance, if citizens continue the habit of illegal littering, the problem of greenhouse gases will persist and hinder progress.

In conclusion, I support the notion that individual contributions are vital for authorities to address the escalating environmental issues. Raising awareness among ordinary citizens about environmentally friendly behaviors is essential to make our world a better place.