You should spend about 40 minutes on this task. Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree? (Write at least 250 words)

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

(Write at least 250 words)

In the ever-changing world humans are living in, communication plays a crucial role in nearly every aspect of life. Some people are of the opinion that verbal communication holds more power than indirect communication, while some are opposed to this viewpoint.

On one hand, non-verbal way of communication grants people time and space to carefully think through the content they wish to convey to other individuals. It is often said that communication is key to all of the relationships and connections in life, but misunderstandings that occur during those interactions, especially ones that are direct, can certainly be detrimental to the well-being of the relationships. As a result, numerous people prefer written communication to the face-to-face alternative.

On the other hand, face-to-face communication can effectively aid people in accurately conveying the meanings and intentions behind words. This method of communication not only offers direct speech, but also offers eye contact and body language – those factors that possess more power than people usually deem. When people directly communicate with each other, the majority of the attention is paid to the individuals engaged in the conversation, thus allowing the interaction to be of higher quality, and gain better results, better understanding. Moreover, through verbal speech, the tone of voice and attitudes of participants are easily conveyed; as a result, this minimizes the risk of misunderstanding between people.

From my perspective, spoken communication, by far, possesses more influence than the written counterpart, thanks to the directness of speech and tone, as well as other factors such as eye contact and body language. However, the indirect method of communication also bears certain advantages; time and space for proper speech organizing being one. It is advisable that people do their research, experience different ways of communication to discover what works best for each connection and relationship.

Gợi ý nâng cấp từ vựng

Errors and Improvements:

1. "Some people are of the opinion that" -> "Some individuals contend that"
   Explanation: "Some people are of the opinion that" is somewhat colloquial. Replacing it with "Some individuals contend that" maintains formality and academic tone while expressing the same idea.

2. "non-verbal way of communication" -> "non-verbal communication"
   Explanation: Simplifying "non-verbal way of communication" to "non-verbal communication" retains clarity and conciseness without sacrificing meaning.

3. "It is often said that communication is key to all of the relationships and connections in life" -> "Communication is commonly regarded as fundamental to all interpersonal relationships."
   Explanation: The suggested revision enhances formality by replacing the colloquial "It is often said that" with "Communication is commonly regarded as" and restructuring the sentence for better flow.

4. "misunderstandings that occur during those interactions, especially ones that are direct" -> "misunderstandings arising from direct interactions"
   Explanation: The revised phrase is more concise and maintains clarity while avoiding unnecessary repetition of "interactions".

5. "numerous people prefer written communication to the face-to-face alternative" -> "Many individuals favor written communication over face-to-face interaction."
   Explanation: The revision offers a more formal and precise alternative, replacing "numerous people" with "Many individuals" and "the face-to-face alternative" with "face-to-face interaction."

6. "not only offers direct speech, but also offers eye contact and body language – those factors that possess more power than people usually deem" -> "provides not only direct speech but also crucial elements such as eye contact and body language, often underestimated in their significance."
   Explanation: The revision improves clarity and formality by restructuring the sentence and replacing the colloquial "but also offers" with "provides."

7. "the majority of the attention is paid to the individuals engaged in the conversation, thus allowing the interaction to be of higher quality, and gain better results, better understanding" -> "attention is primarily focused on the conversational participants, thereby enhancing the quality and efficacy of the interaction."
   Explanation: The revised sentence is more concise and maintains formality while conveying the same meaning.

8. "spoken communication, by far, possesses more influence than the written counterpart" -> "Verbal communication significantly outweighs its written counterpart in influence."
   Explanation: The revised phrase is more succinct and formal, avoiding the informal phrase "by far" while retaining clarity.

9. "thanks to the directness of speech and tone, as well as other factors such as eye contact and body language" -> "due to its directness in speech and tone, coupled with factors like eye contact and body language"
   Explanation: The revision maintains formality and clarity by rephrasing the sentence for smoother flow and avoiding the casual "thanks to."

10. "the indirect method of communication also bears certain advantages" -> "Moreover, indirect communication offers distinct advantages"
    Explanation: The revised phrase is more formal and precise, avoiding the colloquial "bears certain advantages" in favor of "offers distinct advantages."

Band điểm Task Response ước lượng: 8

Band Score for Task Response: 8

• Answer All Parts of the Question:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay adequately addresses all parts of the question. It discusses both the advantages and disadvantages of spoken and written communication, providing examples and reasoning for each perspective. The introduction presents the topic and the two opposing views, while the body paragraphs delve into the benefits of both forms of communication. The conclusion offers a nuanced viewpoint, acknowledging the strengths of spoken communication while also recognizing the value of written communication in certain contexts.
  • How to improve: While the essay does cover all aspects of the prompt, there is room for further elaboration on the disadvantages of spoken communication and the advantages of written communication. Providing more specific examples or exploring counterarguments in greater depth could enhance the thoroughness of the response.

• Present a Clear Position Throughout:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay maintains a clear position throughout, asserting that spoken communication holds more influence than written communication. This stance is evident in the thesis statement and is consistently supported throughout the essay. The author effectively uses examples and reasoning to reinforce their position, such as highlighting the importance of direct speech, tone, eye contact, and body language in spoken communication.
  • How to improve: To further strengthen the clarity of the position, the author could consider addressing potential counterarguments or acknowledging the limitations of spoken communication in certain contexts. This would demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic and provide a more nuanced perspective.

• Present, Extend, and Support Ideas:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay presents, extends, and supports ideas effectively. Each paragraph introduces a new aspect of the argument, providing examples and elaboration to support the points made. The author demonstrates critical thinking by analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of both spoken and written communication, showcasing a comprehensive understanding of the topic.
  • How to improve: To enhance the development of ideas, the author could incorporate additional evidence or research to bolster their arguments. This could involve citing relevant studies or real-life examples to illustrate the impact of communication methods on interpersonal relationships and professional settings.

• Stay on Topic:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay largely stays on topic, discussing the relative power of spoken and written communication as compared to each other. However, there are instances where the discussion veers slightly off course, such as when the author briefly mentions the importance of research and experimentation in discovering effective communication methods. While this point is relevant to the broader theme of communication, it could be more closely tied to the comparison between spoken and written communication.
  • How to improve: To maintain focus and relevance to the topic, the author should ensure that all points made directly contribute to the comparison between spoken and written communication. Any tangential discussions should be seamlessly integrated into the main argument to avoid detracting from the central theme.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong understanding of the topic and effectively addresses the key components of the prompt. With some refinement in providing additional examples, acknowledging counterarguments, and maintaining strict relevance to the topic, the essay could further elevate its effectiveness and coherence.

Band điểm Coherence & Cohesion ước lượng: 6

Band Score for Coherence and Cohesion: 6

• Organize Information Logically:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a generally logical organization of information. It begins with an introduction that presents the topic and the two opposing views, followed by two body paragraphs that discuss each viewpoint in turn. The conclusion provides a clear stance while briefly summarizing the main arguments. However, there are areas where the logical flow could be improved. For instance, the transition between the two body paragraphs could be smoother to enhance coherence.
  • How to improve: To enhance logical organization, consider using transition words or phrases to smoothly connect ideas between paragraphs. Additionally, ensure each paragraph focuses on a single main idea and that the progression of ideas within paragraphs is clear and coherent.

• Use Paragraphs:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay effectively utilizes paragraphs to separate distinct ideas and arguments. Each paragraph addresses a specific aspect of the topic, such as the advantages of verbal and written communication, and provides supporting examples and explanations. However, some paragraphs could be further developed to strengthen the argumentation.
  • How to improve: To improve paragraph structure and effectiveness, ensure that each paragraph has a clear topic sentence that introduces the main idea. Additionally, provide sufficient supporting details and examples to strengthen the argument and avoid repetition within paragraphs.

• Use a Range of Cohesive Devices:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a moderate range of cohesive devices, including transition words and phrases such as "On one hand" and "On the other hand" to indicate contrasting ideas. These cohesive devices help to connect different parts of the essay and guide the reader through the argument. However, there is room for improvement in diversifying the types of cohesive devices used.
  • How to improve: To enhance cohesion, consider incorporating a wider variety of cohesive devices, such as pronouns (e.g., "this," "these"), conjunctions (e.g., "however," "furthermore"), and repetition of key terms or phrases. Additionally, ensure cohesive devices are used consistently throughout the essay to maintain coherence.

Overall, the essay effectively addresses the prompt and presents a coherent argument regarding the power of spoken versus written communication. By implementing the suggested improvements in logical organization, paragraph structure, and cohesive devices, the essay could further strengthen its coherence and cohesion, potentially achieving a higher band score.

Band điểm Lexical Resource ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Lexical Resource: 7

• Use a Wide Range of Vocabulary:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable range of vocabulary throughout, with varied word choices contributing to the coherence and depth of the arguments presented. For instance, phrases like "non-verbal way of communication," "indirect method of communication," and "proper speech organizing" showcase lexical diversity and sophistication.
  • How to improve: To further enhance the lexical resource, consider incorporating more specialized vocabulary related to communication theories or specific examples to bolster the argumentation. Additionally, varying sentence structures and introducing idiomatic expressions can add flair to the writing.

• Use Vocabulary Precisely:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay generally employs vocabulary with precision, effectively conveying ideas without ambiguity. For instance, the distinction made between "verbal" and "written" communication is clear, and terms like "direct speech," "tone of voice," and "attitudes" are used accurately to elucidate the advantages of spoken communication.
  • How to improve: While the precision of vocabulary usage is largely satisfactory, ensure consistency in terminology and avoid repetition of certain phrases ("communication," "method of communication") to maintain clarity and sophistication. Additionally, be cautious of potential misuse or overreliance on common phrases that may dilute the impact of the argument.

• Use Correct Spelling:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay exhibits a high level of spelling accuracy, with no notable errors detracting from the overall readability. Key terms and expressions are spelled correctly, contributing to the professional tone and clarity of the writing.
  • How to improve: To maintain this level of spelling proficiency, continue to review and reinforce spelling rules, particularly for complex or less common words. Utilize tools such as spell-checkers and dictionaries to verify the accuracy of spelling, especially when using specialized terminology or unfamiliar vocabulary.

Overall, while the essay demonstrates strong lexical resource with a wide range of vocabulary and precise usage, maintaining consistency and further enriching the vocabulary can elevate the sophistication and depth of the argumentation. Additionally, continued attention to spelling accuracy will ensure the professionalism and effectiveness of the written communication.

Band điểm Grammatical Range & Accuracy ước lượng: 7

Band Score for Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 7

• Use a Wide Range of Structures:

  • Detailed explanation: The essay demonstrates a commendable variety of sentence structures, incorporating simple, compound, and complex sentences effectively. For instance, the essay employs complex sentences such as "Some people are of the opinion that verbal communication holds more power than indirect communication, while some are opposed to this viewpoint," showcasing the ability to convey complex ideas. Furthermore, there is a skillful use of coordinating conjunctions to link ideas, as seen in "Moreover, through verbal speech, the tone of voice and attitudes of participants are easily conveyed," which enhances coherence.
  • How to improve: While the essay exhibits a strong command of sentence structures, further diversification could enhance its sophistication. Introducing more complex compound-complex sentences or varying the placement of dependent clauses within sentences can elevate the essay’s complexity and fluency. Additionally, incorporating rhetorical devices like parallelism or inversion can add rhetorical flair to the argument.

• Use Grammar and Punctuation Accurately:

  • Detailed explanation: Overall, the essay maintains a high level of grammatical accuracy, with few errors detracting from comprehension. For example, the sentence "Some people are of the opinion that verbal communication holds more power than indirect communication, while some are opposed to this viewpoint," is grammatically sound and effectively conveys the author’s argument. Additionally, punctuation is generally used appropriately to separate clauses and clarify meaning.
  • How to improve: While the essay demonstrates proficiency in grammar and punctuation, occasional errors are present. For instance, in the sentence "This method of communication not only offers direct speech, but also offers eye contact and body language – those factors that possess more power than people usually deem," a hyphen is incorrectly used instead of a semicolon or period to separate clauses. To enhance accuracy further, thorough proofreading focusing on consistency in punctuation usage and agreement between subjects and verbs is recommended. Additionally, familiarizing oneself with advanced punctuation rules, such as the use of em dashes or colons for emphasis, can add sophistication to the writing.

Bài sửa mẫu

In today’s dynamic world, effective communication is indispensable across various spheres of life. There exists a debate regarding the potency of spoken versus written communication. While some argue in favor of verbal communication’s superiority, others oppose this notion.

On one hand, non-verbal communication, such as written correspondence, allows individuals the opportunity to articulate their thoughts with deliberation. Communication is universally acknowledged as pivotal in fostering relationships; however, direct interactions can often lead to misunderstandings, posing a threat to the harmony of relationships. Consequently, many individuals prefer written communication over face-to-face interaction.

Conversely, face-to-face communication facilitates the accurate conveyance of sentiments and intentions. This mode of interaction not only facilitates direct dialogue but also incorporates non-verbal cues like eye contact and body language—elements often underestimated in their significance. Direct communication ensures that the focal point remains on the conversational participants, thereby enriching the quality and efficacy of the interaction. Furthermore, verbal communication, with its immediacy in speech and tone, coupled with non-verbal cues, notably reduces the likelihood of misinterpretation.

From my perspective, spoken communication holds greater sway than its written counterpart owing to its directness in speech and tone, along with the inclusion of non-verbal cues like eye contact and body language. Nevertheless, indirect communication offers distinct advantages, providing individuals with the time and space necessary for thoughtful articulation. It is prudent for individuals to explore various modes of communication to discern the most effective approach for each relationship.